Would you believe it? I tried it out and I got:
5) the proxy adds Path and adds Requires:path.
The registrar doesn't support it, doesn't copy the Path and doesn't
use it.
Welcome to SIP in action!!!
-Original Message-
From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@cisco.com]
Sent: 01
Oh and before anyone corrects me,
I actually used Require: path (not Requires as written in the e-mail)
-Original Message-
From: Attila Sipos
Sent: 02 April 2009 16:01
To: 'Paul Kyzivat'
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] What's the harm in
Attila Sipos wrote:
Would you believe it? I tried it out and I got:
5) the proxy adds Path and adds Requires:path.
The registrar doesn't support it, doesn't copy the Path and doesn't
use it.
Welcome to SIP in action!!!
I can't tell if you are happy, or what.
The registrar is
The registrar is non-conforming. It should have failed the request since
Yes, absolutely.
My reaction was just because the behaviour was so ridiculous.
SIP in action!! is just my sarcastic/satirical exclaimation - stuff in the
real world
doesn't do even the most basics of checks!!
* sigh *
