mailto:sip-
> implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Michael
> Hirschbichler
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 8:58 AM
> To: SIPImplementors
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] "require" and "supported"-Header regarding
> reliable Responses
>
> Hi all,
&
Michael Hirschbichler wrote:
> Thx, I got it :)
>
> 2nd question in this context: If in an INVITE-request an "Allow: PRACK,
> ..."-Header is set, am I correct in the assumption, that there must be a
> "supported: 100rel"-Header too?
Logically they are distinct. So "in principle" you could sup
Thx, I got it :)
2nd question in this context: If in an INVITE-request an "Allow: PRACK,
..."-Header is set, am I correct in the assumption, that there must be a
"supported: 100rel"-Header too?
br
Michael
Am 06.05.2010 15:45, schrieb Paul Kyzivat:
>
>
> Michael Hirschbichler wrote:
>> Hi all,
Michael Hirschbichler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we are currently discussing if it is possible (and - esp. - allowed) to
> set both, a "Require:"- and a "Supported:"-Header with the
> "100rel"-option in the same INVITE-Request. In my opinion, if 100rel is
> set in the "Require:"-header, it is impli
Hi all,
we are currently discussing if it is possible (and - esp. - allowed) to
set both, a "Require:"- and a "Supported:"-Header with the
"100rel"-option in the same INVITE-Request. In my opinion, if 100rel is
set in the "Require:"-header, it is implicitely also supported and
should not expli
