-implementors] sdp with missing m line
karthik karthik wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Please let me know the behavior for the below cases.
> I believe 'm=' line is not mandatory according to rfc 4566
> Still It was decided to release the session in our application.
>
> c
karthik karthik wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Please let me know the behavior for the below cases.
> I believe 'm=' line is not mandatory according to rfc 4566
> Still It was decided to release the session in our application.
>
> case1:
> Invite is received with SDP, and has no 'm=' line.
> In case w
Inline with [SSS]
Somesh S Shanbhag
M G L Bangalore
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of karthik karthik
Sent: Fri 10/31/2008 11:05 AM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] sdp with missing m line
Hello All,
Please let me know the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
karthik karthik
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 1:36 PM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] sdp with missing m line
Hello All,
Please let me know the behavior for the below cases.
I believe 'm=&#x
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:05 AM, karthik karthik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Please let me know the behavior for the below cases.
> I believe 'm=' line is not mandatory according to rfc 4566
> Still It was decided to release the session in our application.
>
> case1:
> Invite is re
Hello All,
Please let me know the behavior for the below cases.
I believe 'm=' line is not mandatory according to rfc 4566
Still It was decided to release the session in our application.
case1:
Invite is received with SDP, and has no 'm=' line.
In case we need to reject such an Invite,
what is th
