http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-10437
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Unless there is no objection I will condense into a jira.
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Tony Graziano <
>> tgrazi...@myitdepart
Unless there is no objection I will condense into a jira.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Tony Graziano <
> tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote:
>
>> Using the below as a guide--What are the chances multiple package updates
>> will send
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Tony Graziano <
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote:
> Using the below as a guide--What are the chances multiple package updates
> will send server profiles more than one time?
>
Because you asked, although I'm not sure what use this information is good
for
It'
Using the below as a guide--What are the chances multiple package updates
will send server profiles more than one time?
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Tony Graziano <
> tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote:
>
>> We've seen a small numbe
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Tony Graziano <
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote:
> We've seen a small number of instances with 4.6 where sending the server
> profiles seemed to resolve the issue. This was almost always after an
> update to the sipx system is made.
>
> So I need to ask, is it
We've seen a small number of instances with 4.6 where sending the server
profiles seemed to resolve the issue. This was almost always after an
update to the sipx system is made.
So I need to ask, is it justifiable to add a watch mechanism that says "new
package installed/send server profiles!" as
