Re: [sipx-users] SipX and Xen redux

2009-02-20 Thread Dale Worley
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 14:06 -0500, Alan McKay wrote: > - Install CentOS 5.2 into a machine with 1G RAM, 1.8Ghz processor, 200G or so > HD > - install the Zimbra email system into this > - create a Xen VM using 512MB RAM > - install SipX into the VM > > I know that's not much RAM but I've seen lab

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 330 with Mediant100 - Incoming Call mutes

2009-02-20 Thread Michael Picher
If you define a new phone not in any group you should get the default settings... On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 22:40 +0800, Cuneyt M wrote: > Hi Scott, > > I was using ROM 4.0 with SIP 2.2. Without changing any settings i > upgraded the ROM to 4.1.2 and SIP 3.1.1 on sipx 3.10.3 (which i > upgraded from

Re: [sipx-users] SipX and Xen redux

2009-02-20 Thread Tony Graziano
Holding your breathe may result in headaches. -Original Message- From: Alan McKay To: sipx-users Sent: 2/20/2009 2:23:45 PM Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SipX and Xen redux On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > having dabbled with Zimbra, I can say the memory is not nea

Re: [sipx-users] SipX and Xen redux

2009-02-20 Thread Alan McKay
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > having dabbled with Zimbra, I can say the memory is not nearly enough. I > wouldn't do that. Over time, RAM usage would be totally consumed (by design) > in sipx. You're playing with fire. Aha - that's what I was hoping to hear! Some real

Re: [sipx-users] SipX and Xen redux

2009-02-20 Thread Tony Graziano
having dabbled with Zimbra, I can say the memory is not nearly enough. I wouldn't do that. Over time, RAM usage would be totally consumed (by design) in sipx. You're playing with fire. >>> Alan McKay 02/20/09 2:08 PM >>> Hey folks, I just went through the list archives searching on "Xen", and

Re: [sipx-users] SipX Enterprise Deployment

2009-02-20 Thread Asaf Rapoport
Resending this using the right account.. Hello everyone, > > this is my first post here so I hope I am following the rules, and if not > please let me know. > > My questions: > > Does anyone have suggestions /recommendations /drawings / info on deploying > sipx in a large enterprise, with multiple

[sipx-users] SipX and Xen redux

2009-02-20 Thread Alan McKay
Hey folks, I just went through the list archives searching on "Xen", and it seems like it is in fact possible to run SipX in a Xen VM, with small systems. I'm just looking to set up a home system so it would be very low use. What I'm hoping to do is this : - Install CentOS 5.2 into a machine wi

Re: [sipx-users] NOTIFY first, 202 Accepted second?

2009-02-20 Thread M. Ranganathan
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:48 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Dale Worley wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 17:31 +, Gabor Paller wrote: >> >>> After this message, however, 202 Accepted does not arrive but SipX >>> immediately returns a NOTIFY. >>> >> >>> This confus

Re: [sipx-users] SFTF download ???

2009-02-20 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 15:03 -0500, Vasanthakumari Ramasamy wrote: > Hello, > > > I'm looking to download SFTF. I looked into > http://www.sipfoundry.org/sftf-user-guide.html#downloading, where it > says > > https://scm.sipfoundry.org/rep/sftf/. > > > > But the link fails. Any help

Re: [sipx-users] NOTIFY first, 202 Accepted second?

2009-02-20 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 17:31 +, Gabor Paller wrote: > Hi, > > I have the following interesting situation with SipX 3.10.2. There is a > JAIN-SIP application subscribed to MWI notifications. Before the > scenario presented below, there was a successful subscription and it is > expiring, therefor

Re: [sipx-users] state of ha in sipx

2009-02-20 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 11:41 +0300, Nikolay Kondratyev wrote: > Hi all, > > The main problem I found when testing HA setup was as following: > If master host fails, all established calls can not be correctly terminated > and can not be transferred. > The problem (as I understood it) was that sipx s

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 330 with Mediant100 - Incoming Call mutes

2009-02-20 Thread Cuneyt M
Hi Scott, I was using ROM 4.0 with SIP 2.2. Without changing any settings i upgraded the ROM to 4.1.2 and SIP 3.1.1 on sipx 3.10.3 (which i upgraded from 3.8 via yum recently) and the auto-answer / mute disappeared and started to act as expected. However, I am getting intermittent freeze of

Re: [sipx-users] password encryption

2009-02-20 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 07:13 -0500, Damian Krzeminski wrote: > dimitris(yahoo) wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I noticed, when you make export the user database, the password is not > > encrypted. Is there any specific reason for this, or should it be in mind > > for the next release (eg MD5 encryption)

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 330 with Mediant100 - Incoming Call mutes the Active Call

2009-02-20 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 04:15 +0800, Cuneyt M wrote: > However, i am facing with a bigger problem. When user A is on an active > call with outsider B, and a new call comes in to A, user A will be muted > although outsider B can hear user A. Since only one side can hear, they > have no option but

Re: [sipx-users] password encryption

2009-02-20 Thread Damian Krzeminski
dimitris(yahoo) wrote: > Hi everyone, > I noticed, when you make export the user database, the password is not > encrypted. Is there any specific reason for this, or should it be in mind > for the next release (eg MD5 encryption)? Also the PIN, is not visible. Is > this encrypted somehow ? > PINs

Re: [sipx-users] [Bulk] Re: static ip address

2009-02-20 Thread Michael Picher
Yes. The 30 seconds is probably more the router terminating the connection through the firewall (it's not sip aware). The sipX server does not support stun at this point... this is how your two phones were able to communicate. Mike On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 17:56 +0200, dimitris(yahoo) wrote: > I

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 330 with Mediant100 - Incoming Call mutes the Active Call

2009-02-20 Thread Michael Picher
Cuneyt, How about only allowing one call per line registration as a workaround? Mike On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 04:15 +0800, Cuneyt M wrote: > Hi again, > > I wrote in an earlier email with great length the issue i am experiencing. > > I will keep it short and simple with the hope that i can get so