[sipx-users] Voicemail customization: Time based OGM recording with no menu or system prompts

2009-05-12 Thread Carlos Robotti
We are testing sipx as voicemail solution for a radio broadcasting company. They need to customize the voicemail system to switch the OGM based on the day and hour, the OGM changes according to the programs schedule of the radio, to receive the listeners comments. Because it´s massive callers

Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Groups and Max Forward

2009-05-12 Thread Robert Joly
> > On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 12:14 -0400, Joly, Robert (CAR:9D30) wrote: > > > > That's interesting. I do all my debugging with tcpdump/wireshark > > > using the 'any' interface and that always gets me the intra-box > > > messages as well... > > Not the ones that go between services on the _other

Re: [sipx-users] Remote Worker Questions

2009-05-12 Thread Dale Worley
This is probably not relevant to the main question, but when I extracted the registrations from the logs that I've seen, I only saw 4 REGISTERs, and they were all from ext. 201. The first REGISTER got a 401 response, the following 3 got 200 responses. It appears that the registrar is not set to l

Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Groups and Max Forward

2009-05-12 Thread Scott Lawrence
> On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 12:14 -0400, Joly, Robert (CAR:9D30) wrote: > > That's interesting. I do all my debugging with tcpdump/wireshark using > > the 'any' interface and that always gets me the intra-box messages as > > well... Not the ones that go between services on the _other_ HA node you w

Re: [sipx-users] Can not dial extensions via LinkSys SPA-2102 or LinkSys SPA-3102

2009-05-12 Thread Clint Anderson
Dale, Thank you for your help. I will get a trace together later today and attach it to a post. Thanx again! Cheers, Clint -Original Message- From: Dale Worley [mailto:dwor...@nortel.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:58 PM To: Clint Anderson Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subje

Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Groups and Max Forward

2009-05-12 Thread Dale Worley
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 12:14 -0400, Joly, Robert (CAR:9D30) wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 16:27 -0400, Matt White wrote: > > > The initial invite for the incoming call has Max forwards set to 16. > > > A wireshark shows right before it gets to the fallback > > extension there > > > are 8 VIA he

Re: [sipx-users] Can not dial extensions via LinkSys SPA-2102 orLinkSys SPA-3102

2009-05-12 Thread Dale Worley
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 11:21 -0400, Clint Anderson wrote: > I have looked at the trace xml (merged log files) in sipViewer, but > truth be > told, that's a bit over my pay grade. Also, I wasn't sure if it was > acceptable to post the trace xml here. > > 1) Is it ok to post the trace xml? > 2) If s

Re: [sipx-users] Removing some options in user web interface

2009-05-12 Thread Damian Krzeminski
Samy Touati wrote: > Hi, > > I tried that, but after commenting out the parts not needed, they are > still showing up. I did stop and restart the servers during the editing > phase. > Is Navigation.html the only file to modify? > WEB-INF/user/UserNavigation.html is the only file you need to chan

Re: [sipx-users] Bug on User Page

2009-05-12 Thread Black, Dave (DAVCOM)
Did you get 4.0 via an upgrade?? Reason for this question is that I've seen this error when there is a permission problem, say files are not owned by sipxchange:sipxchange and sipxconfig cannot perform the update. For starters, check /var/sipxdata/mediaserver/data/mailstore/ and replace with the

Re: [sipx-users] Removing some options in user web interface

2009-05-12 Thread Samy Touati
Hi, I tried that, but after commenting out the parts not needed, they are still showing up. I did stop and restart the servers during the editing phase. Is Navigation.html the only file to modify? Thanks. Samy. On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Damian Krzeminski wrote: > Samy Touati wrote: > > Hi

Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group >3 extensions is not falling back to an auto attendant

2009-05-12 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 09:04 -0400, Nathaniel Watkins wrote: > All of the extensions in the hunt group are set to ring at the same time > (so adding more isn't increasing the amount of time). I've adjusted the > ring time from 15-30 seconds. This doesn't seem to matter. Here is a > screen shot: h

Re: [sipx-users] Upgrade from 3.11.12 to 4.0 stable - EPIC FAIL!

2009-05-12 Thread Dale Worley
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 12:49 +0200, Borginger Rikard wrote: > How can I fix this? Given that you've told us almost no information, it's hard to guess. But in regard to the web interface not being accessible, I'd look in sipxconfig.log as well as the httpd_*_log files. Once you get the web interfa

Re: [sipx-users] Upgrade from 3.11.12 to 4.0 stable - EPIC FAIL!

2009-05-12 Thread Kevin Thorley
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 12:49 +0200, Borginger Rikard wrote: > Hi gang. > > I had a server running a 3.11.12-build and today I decided to upgrade > it to 4.0 stable. I shut the sipxecs-service down, stoppped the > postgresql service, downloaded the stable-repo, changed the > $releasever to 5, yumme

Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group >3 extensions is not falling back to an auto attendant

2009-05-12 Thread Nathaniel Watkins
All of the extensions in the hunt group are set to ring at the same time (so adding more isn't increasing the amount of time). I've adjusted the ring time from 15-30 seconds. This doesn't seem to matter. Here is a screen shot: http://www.garrettcounty.org/sipx/huntgroup.jpg Once I add a 4th ent

Re: [sipx-users] Bug on User Page

2009-05-12 Thread Damian Krzeminski
Charles wrote: > I am using 4.0 and am getting the message "an internal error has > occurred" on two separate occasions: > 1] I was attempting to change a extension number for a user and then > clicked OK or Apply. This was tried on multiple occasions. To > eventually get the change I wante

[sipx-users] Upgrade from 3.11.12 to 4.0 stable - EPIC FAIL!

2009-05-12 Thread Borginger Rikard
Hi gang. I had a server running a 3.11.12-build and today I decided to upgrade it to 4.0 stable. I shut the sipxecs-service down, stoppped the postgresql service, downloaded the stable-repo, changed the $releasever to 5, yummed it, everything seems fine BUT this is what I see when trying to acc