On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Gabor Paller wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We have a SipX installation and we have connected it to a sip trunk.
> Everything works very well but SipX responds with an error response to the
> OPTIONS messages sent by the trunk operator. The following messages were
> captured i
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Matt Keys wrote:
> I just noticed in System -> Servers -> that it was
> displaying the following on SIP Trunking:
>
> "User Name is mandatory for ITSP accounts requiring Registration. Check
> ITSP account xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx"
>
> I didn't get an alert about this via ema
Doesn't ring a bell to me but I've never setup a connection to CCM...
I'm going to push this back to the list because I think there are a
couple guys there who can help.
From: arda savran [mailto:ardasav...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 4:53 PM
To: Picher, Michael
Subject: RE: [sipx
I don't worry much about the quality on the PBX... I worry more about
the voice traffic travelling across the network without proper QoS in
place.
I also strongly prefer a separate VLan for the PBX / Phones / Gateways.
I've just worked on too many networks where something (dns, dhcp, etc)
gets me
I just noticed in System -> Servers -> that it was
displaying the following on SIP Trunking:
"User Name is mandatory for ITSP accounts requiring Registration. Check
ITSP account xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx"
I didn't get an alert about this via email though.
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:49 -0400, Scott Lawrence
One of the devs will have to give you the details on that. I can tell
you from experience that if sipXsupervisor is broken because of a
version mismatch your registrations will start to fail. Click System ->
Servers -> . It will show you a list of the services and if
they are in alarm status and fo
I know sipXsupervisor is one of the services, but how does it relate to
Registrar (and other services)? How can it be configured?
> Make sure sipXsupervisor is working correctly between the two.
>
>
> On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 14:28 -0400, ingo...@ wrote:
>> I got phones expiring after 2000 t
Make sure sipXsupervisor is working correctly between the two.
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 14:28 -0400, ingo...@netvision.an wrote:
> I got phones expiring after 2000 to 3000 seconds. And they won't register
> again by themselves. How can this be solved? I didn't have this issue when
> I tested them in
I got phones expiring after 2000 to 3000 seconds. And they won't register
again by themselves. How can this be solved? I didn't have this issue when
I tested them in a non-HA configuration. Both Registrars on Primary and
Redundant servers are running OK.
___
Hi Klaus, thank you for siptapi
I tested SIPTAPI 0.2.6 it on SIPX 4.01 and it works nicely for me. Is there
a version of siptapi available
for windows 64 bit systems?
Thank you,
Heros
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at]
Inviato: martedì 9 giug
Rob, you should describe in more detail your load balancer/firewall.
If it is possible, you should use your firewall to NAT the approriate ports for
the "PUBLIC" ip address sipxbridge is asserting.
(5060, 3-31000 UDP). You should also allow those ports outbound. Ifyour
ITSP allows it, you s
Hi,
We have a SipX installation and we have connected it to a sip trunk.
Everything works very well but SipX responds with an error response to
the OPTIONS messages sent by the trunk operator. The following messages
were captured in promiscuous mode, so even messages inside the SipX
server woul
See the attached. This is both internal LAN clients and also external
(NAT'd) clients. The quality is perfect and the reliability has been
rock solid once the configuration bugs were worked out. I'm running on a
quad core Xeon X3220 2.4Ghz with 2gb of RAM and a 80 gb HD. CPU usage
hasn't gone above
On Thursday 02 July 2009 17:01:30 Scott Lawrence wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 08:30 -0400, Matus Martinak wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > recently my sipxpbx ( v3.8 ) start doing strange thing.
>
> others have already explained why the transfer was correct - I'm just
> going to jump in here and sug
My $0.02...
If you are building a phone system on a hobbled together foundation (the
network), you'll end up with a hobbled together phone system. For 3 or
4 phones this may not matter. For anything more than that the system
will not scale well and users will get disgusted with reliability and
c
Can anybody please clarify if this fix will be included in 4.0.2?
Thanks in advance,
Nikolay.
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Backup Admin
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 9:19 PM
> To: Dale
16 matches
Mail list logo
