Re: [sipx-users] Msg Notice Modifications

Lordy I wish this list was in fact forums, then I could simply edit my post rather than have to keep adding messages to my thread :). Anyhow, obviously, this doesn't seem to apply to version 4.0.2. There is not General section un System. Is it somewhere else and I'm just not catching it? http:/

Re: [sipx-users] Msg Notice Modifications

> I would like to change the from address as it currently says from > postmaster. > Then the look and links, etc. > HTTP ERROR: 404 Forget this, just half asleep here :). What I need aside from changing the postmaster address is to change the URL that is sent to the user. What I need is to chan

[sipx-users] Msg Notice Modifications

Is there a way of modifying the emails sent to users about messages left for them, which can be retained through sipx updates etc. Whether or not they can be retained is not as important as knowing where to make the necessary changes. I would like to change the from address as it currently says

Re: [sipx-users] mikrotik and sipx

I have had my system setup behind a mikrotik for the last 6 months... works great. I have port 5080 forwarded and have disabled h323 and sip service ports in IP-->Firewall-->Service Ports.   I have 4.0.2 sipx , bandwidth, static IP, and dedicated sipx server. this is my first sip system, but if

Re: [sipx-users] sipxecs behind endian firewall

thanks for the detailed explanation. I would very much like to test out pfsense, where can I get the vmware version. my endian is actually also installed in vmware. My only concern with going this route is, I would have to reconfigure my cluster again if I were to switch my central firewall,

Re: [sipx-users] mikrotik and sipx

Yes. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of think Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 5:37 PM Cc: sipx-users Subject: Re: [sipx-users] mikrotik and sipx Have you tried disabling the sip helper under /ip firewall service-port ?

Re: [sipx-users] mikrotik and sipx

Have you tried disabling the sip helper under /ip firewall service- port ? On Oct 29, 2009, at 4:30 PM, Picher, Michael wrote: I’m fighting with one right now… I’m not sure if I’m having port randomization problems or a sip helper kicking in or what. I can register fine, call out, call

Re: [sipx-users] mikrotik and sipx

I'm fighting with one right now... I'm not sure if I'm having port randomization problems or a sip helper kicking in or what. I can register fine, call out, call any extension from a teleworker but can't get any calls to the teleworker. It's like it is not registered (goes directly to voic

Re: [sipx-users] VLAN question

Well, the non-vlan aware PC would go into the untagged vlan (or native vlan) for that port. If you want the PC or server to go into the phone vlan (not quite sure what you are asking), just set the phone vlan as untagged (or native) for that port. Mike -Original Message- From: think [mai

Re: [sipx-users] VLAN question

Vlans are a really good idea for qos and other obvious reasons, but not a requirement. Not touched a mikrotik before. Perhaps a post in their forum with your router oS version will get some response. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Ema

[sipx-users] mikrotik and sipx

Is there anyone here using sipx behind a 1:1 NAT on a mikrotik router? Are there any issues or gotcha's to look out for, like port randomization that effects pfsense router (which is on by default but can be turned off as found documented here http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Static_Port

Re: [sipx-users] VLAN question

Can this be done with a non-vlan aware PC connected to the phone as well? Thanks, Brent On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:40 AM, Picher, Michael wrote: > You need to setup all of your ports as trunk ports, make your data > vlan > (typically 1) as the native vlan. > > By default Cisco's will trunk all vl

Re: [sipx-users] Updates

I’m having a similar issue with calling to an external phone except mine goes directly to voicemail and never rings the external phone (registered through sipxbridge, behind a Mikrotik router/firewall). Not sure what’s going on at this point. Mike From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfou

Re: [sipx-users] Updates

Thanks for the tips. I have to check out those links when I'm work tomorrow. Since I haven't had the time to check those links, the following question might be solved as soon as I check them. But maybe this is related to 4.0.3. Now to the problem. I set up call forwarding to my cell phone. When I

Re: [sipx-users] Updates

I’m not seeing this same behavior. Mike From: cyrill.rei...@iscoord.com [mailto:cyrill.rei...@iscoord.com] Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:38 AM To: sipx-users Cc: Picher, Michael Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Updates Hey Mike, Here is a little update. I installed and configured sip

Re: [sipx-users] Updates

On 10/29/2009 11:48 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > > 4.0.4 has three outstanding issues right now according to the tracker. > > http://track.sipfoundry.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=10130&fixfor=10640 >

Re: [sipx-users] Updates

4.0.4 has three outstanding issues right now according to the tracker. http://track.sipfoundry.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=10130&fixfor=10640 I'm not sure any of these address your issue or contribute to your CDR i

Re: [sipx-users] Updates

Hey Mike, Here is a little update. I installed and configured sipXecs 4.0.3 today. Although all phone functions worked fine, there seems to be a problem with the "Call Detail Records" in the Web Interface. In the "Active" calls tab, calls continue to show up even though there is no active conn

Re: [sipx-users] sipxecs behind endian firewall

If it matters, your gateway is handling nat traversal via the ITSP very differently than a siptrunk. It's a gateway and not a siptrunk using sipxbridge. Endian only handles SNAT, source/softwires, but not symmetric NAT which is a requirement for sipxbridge. Your gateway (which is probably an FXS AT

Re: [sipx-users] sipxecs behind endian firewall

Yup.. I use Endian EFW (Community), in my case, also installed under VMware. Have been using 2.2 since May and just upgraded to 2.3 yesterday. Works great. I use OpenVPN to connect remote phones so the firewall doesn't really play a role for that. I don't do too much with SipxBridge, but

Re: [sipx-users] sipxecs behind endian firewall

Just to save you some trouble, Endian does not do symmetric nat at all. *Symmetric NAT* - Each request from the same internal IP address and port to a specific destination IP address and port is mapped to a unique external source IP address and port. - If the same internal host sends

Re: [sipx-users] Updates

I just did a build with the 4.0.3 iso and it seemed fine. I'm not sure if the problems Scott was referring to were additional problems or problems with (or caused by) 4.0.3 as he wasn't clear. I'm also running 4.0.3 on my home system which was upgraded from 4.0.2. Mike From: sipx-us

Re: [sipx-users] sipxecs behind endian firewall

I have not tested that firewall personally. As a general rule however, you would want to make sure and disable the sip proxy in endian. Mike -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Francis Tinio Sent: Th

Re: [sipx-users] Updates

I'm about to reinstall sipXecs, because there was a problem with the server hardware. Should I use 4.0.2 or will 4.0.3 be fine? Best regards Cyrill Reiser cyrill.rei...@iscoord.com is||coord ag Information Solutions Coordinators a subsidiary of ffc fincoord holding ltd. | Beustweg 12 | CH-8032 Zu

[sipx-users] sipxecs behind endian firewall

Hi. >From a previous topic I wa having, it seems that endian might be a cuplrit >with sipx working behind an endian firewall. unfortunately for me, I'm in no >position to replce the firewall right now as it will be more work to change. has anyone been able to get sipx to work behind endian fir