Hi
OK - my system is just a testing/prototyping system in a consumer Telco
environment for delivering voice services to a bunch of test consumers using
Residential Gateways - not your typical SIPXecs usage.
As such, we don't use the concept of internal extensions and when creating a
user identity
Yes, Both are as in *.domain.com.
s
On Dec 30, 2009, at 12:49 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> You need to state whether these networks are listed on the System>Internet
> Calling under "Intranet Subnets" or not.
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:36 PM, steven warner wrote:
>
> (Sorry folks - my post
You need to state whether these networks are listed on the System>Internet
Calling under "Intranet Subnets" or not.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:36 PM, steven warner wrote:
>
> (Sorry folks - my posts were too big before!)
>
> For the experts. I have wiresharked my site<>site calling problem,
> and
(Sorry folks - my posts were too big before!)
For the experts. I have wiresharked my site<>site calling problem,
and need to know if my supposition has any merit.
Below is a link to snipplet of the RDP conversation from my end only.
By comparing this to a successful call, it seems to me that t
Consider yourself lucky as these things don't always have a happy ending
(with Grandstream, I mean)
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 12/30/2009 12:01 PM, Alan van der Vyver wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Yes I have. It is quite difficult to do it systematic
Hi!
Yes I have. It is quite difficult to do it systematically, because they
are not the friendliest format and the parameters are not all in the
same sequence, but I have actually found the problem.
The default local SIP port for each line on the 3.10 server was blank
and the telephone then de
Thanks! I'll look into that.
Mike Burden
Lynk Systems, Inc
e-mail: m...@lynk.com
Phone: 616-532-4985
-Original Message-
From: Josh Patten [mailto:jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us]
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 12:10 PM
To: Burden, Mike
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sip
As I cannot find any more information on this, I was wondering if I could use
an SSL processor in front of sipx. These servers allow for text to server and
SSL to user. Could this be done?
Mike
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:20:27 -0600, m...@grounded.net wrote:
> I am following the steps in;
>
> htt
http://www.sipprint.com/
Michael W.Burden wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="utf-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Organization: SipXecs Forum
> In-Reply-To: <053901ca7c65$f1f35e40$d5da1a...@net>
> X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <39514>
> Message-ID: <9a5a.4b3b7...@
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: <053901ca7c65$f1f35e40$d5da1a...@net>
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <39514>
Message-ID: <9a5a.4b3b7...@forum.sipfoundry.org>
1. recording is a phone function at th
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 17:32 +1300, Justin Menga wrote:
> Hi
>
> The From address is the format
> @ - for example,
> <0275779...@210.55.232.170> - this of course does not match a locally
> configured user identity on SIPXecs as the calling party number will
> always be a PSTN number.
>
> Note that
11 matches
Mail list logo
