Re: [sipx-users] How to setup another website on sipx server?

On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 8:58 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote: > Only thing to keep in mind is that you might need to use a different port > depending on your needs and assuming this is not a problem on sipx. The > iptables filter aren't in play so other than that, I don't know why this > would not w

Re: [sipx-users] Max amount of users monitoring park extension?

http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8474 patch posted. If you are able, please test and provide feedback. There is a known issue regarding the order of BLF lists if all the names/numbers in a list stay the same but the order changes. Read the issue comments for more details. On 07/02/2010 07:

Re: [sipx-users] Random Dropped Registrations

> No - they just add some date/time formatting code. I tried installing the required module using; force install DateTime::Format::ISO8601 and that leads to more problems. Going to read /root/.cpan/Metadata Database was generated on Mon, 05 Jul 2010 04:27:04 GMT DateTime::Format::ISO8601 is up

Re: [sipx-users] Sipxecs behind NAT, firewall rules and ITSP Time out problem on outgoing calls.

I will encourage you to look this over: http://blog.myitdepartment.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Call-Setup-Example-sipXecs-through-ITSP1.pdf It may help explain things a little to you. On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > I dont know why you have port 5070 and 5090 stated. I

Re: [sipx-users] Sipxecs behind NAT, firewall rules and ITSP Time out problem on outgoing calls.

I dont know why you have port 5070 and 5090 stated. I assume your ITSP shows you registered via port 5080, and its likely they will send you calls on 5080. When you send calls to them, it should be on 5060, but in frame 14 you are sending "to them" on port 5080. Can you explain why you have change

Re: [sipx-users] Sipxecs behind NAT, firewall rules and ITSP Time out problem on outgoing calls.

Thanks for your answers and fast reply, Tony. Sorry for the trace, yes i altered it to mask some sensitive information from trace. I will be more careful for the next time and will follow your advice for clarifying. Sorry again :) I was thinking that not sending the public ip address might be the

Re: [sipx-users] Sipxecs behind NAT, firewall rules and ITSP Time out problem on outgoing calls.

Wow. How in the world can that ever work? Look at the trace. You are not sending the real IP address of sipx to the ITSP I believe. It will of course timeout because it can't route to you. Besides the domain name, did you alter the trace to make it unintelligible? If so, you need to clarify that o

Re: [sipx-users] Sipxecs behind NAT, firewall rules and ITSP Time out problem on outgoing calls.

I don't see the attached trace. Your iptables looks woefully incomplete (it does not address your media ports range). I am not an iptables expert, I find it has a horrible interface from an organizational standpoint. Here is one that was working that i had access to. You might extract what might

[sipx-users] Sipxecs behind NAT, firewall rules and ITSP Time out problem on outgoing calls.

Hi, before asking my questions i would like to explain our installation and network, so you can have a better idea what we have done and we are trying to do. We have one machine with 1 public ip address. We have installed on this machine openvpn server and also virtualbox. We created one virtual

Re: [sipx-users] Recommended free virtualization platform for sipx?

I think what we've all taken from this, and should always remember, is that resources (RAM/CPU) and storage (amount, read/write latency) is very key with ANY sip based platform, especially when using it to test the media services against, as they tend to be more sensitive. Just because the media se

Re: [sipx-users] Recommended free virtualization platform for sipx?

Hi, We have some deployments with quite good user experience on Amazon EC2, which is a XEN based platform. I think XEN is a safe bet. BR, Chris -Original Message- From: Nathaniel Watkins [mailto:nwatk...@garrettcounty.org] Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 6:51 PM To: 'sipx-users' Subject: