Re: [sipx-users] The user ID or alias "1000" duplicates an existing alias for a user or service

2010-11-01 Thread Gabe Casey
Indeed you are right it was an IM id for another user. I appreciate the help Gabrial Casey Telecommunications Franklin American Mortgage Company 501 Corporate Center Dr. Suite 400 Franklin, TN 37067 Direct:615-468- 2945 Cell: 615-852-5015 Fax: 615-628-5698 Email:gca...@franklinamer

Re: [sipx-users] Voip.ms

2010-11-01 Thread Todd Hodgen
I've been told that Broadvox will be rolling out their new user portal in early 2011, which will have the features you are looking for. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Gary Luca Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 12:01 PM To

Re: [sipx-users] The user ID or alias "1000" duplicates an existing alias for a user or service

2010-11-01 Thread Tony Graziano
look at the aliases file directly cat /var/sipxdata/sipdb/aliases.xml im betting its assigned somewhere On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Gabe Casey wrote: > I am getting the error The user ID or alias "1000" duplicates an existing > alias for a user or service > I have re indexed checked both th

[sipx-users] The user ID or alias "1000" duplicates an existing alias for a user or service

2010-11-01 Thread Gabe Casey
I am getting the error The user ID or alias "1000" duplicates an existing alias for a user or service I have re indexed checked both the users , IM and conference and dialplan i can not find any instance of this I have even run queries on the database to find it. Nothing. How can i move past

Re: [sipx-users] G.729AB - Freeswitch

2010-11-01 Thread Tony Graziano
you need a siptrace in this instance to see whats up. On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Sven Evensen wrote: > Since calls to VM are working, it seems the license is installed > correctly. Unless your internal > > calls are not using G729. > > > > A look at wireshark will quickly show what is wrong

Re: [sipx-users] G.729AB - Freeswitch

2010-11-01 Thread Sven Evensen
Since calls to VM are working, it seems the license is installed correctly. Unless your internal calls are not using G729. A look at wireshark will quickly show what is wrong here. If it is a codec problem, you will normally see "488 Not acceptable" Sven

Re: [sipx-users] SIPX's Remote UA access services

2010-11-01 Thread Tony Graziano
its been discussed, but like anything in the roadmap, its not committed to at this time and the discussion has not taken place yet as it is not scheduled to until after 4.4 is release and checked out. On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote: > Judging by your response, it is in the p

Re: [sipx-users] G.729AB - Freeswitch

2010-11-01 Thread Tony Graziano
did you verify the codec is running and license is available using the fs_cli? On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:47 PM, James Black wrote: > Hi Sven, > > > > Thanks, have tried that too. No luck. It’s almost like the call is not > transferred/answered by voicemail ITSP, or its answered and then it hangs

Re: [sipx-users] SIPX's Remote UA access services

2010-11-01 Thread Roman Gelfand
Judging by your response, it is in the plans. Any idea when? On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > No, just the rtp range at this time. > > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > Fax: 434.984.8431 > > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net >

Re: [sipx-users] G.729AB - Freeswitch

2010-11-01 Thread James Black
Hi Sven, Thanks, have tried that too. No luck. It's almost like the call is not transferred/answered by voicemail ITSP, or its answered and then it hangs up. The reason that I have to use G.729AB is that it is the only Codec the ITSP uses. Kind regards James Black From: Sven Eve

Re: [sipx-users] Issues with external rewrite of the web ui

2010-11-01 Thread Gabe Casey
yes sorry i verified that we are using apache as a proxy to the portal. Gabrial Casey Telecommunications Franklin American Mortgage Company 501 Corporate Center Dr. Suite 400 Franklin, TN 37067 Direct:615-468- 2945 Cell: 615-852-5015 Fax: 615-628-5698 Email:gca...@franklinamerican.co

Re: [sipx-users] SIPX's Remote UA access services

2010-11-01 Thread Tony Graziano
No, just the rtp range at this time. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http:

Re: [sipx-users] SIPX's Remote UA access services

2010-11-01 Thread Roman Gelfand
I was refering to the NAT configuration where public port is 5060. On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote: > If I am not mistaken, I think it was mentioned before that remote > registrations can only take place on port 5060.  However, it appears > that I could change that, including

[sipx-users] SIPX's Remote UA access services

2010-11-01 Thread Roman Gelfand
If I am not mistaken, I think it was mentioned before that remote registrations can only take place on port 5060. However, it appears that I could change that, including rtp port range. Is that right? Thanks in advance ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-

Re: [sipx-users] Issues with external rewrite of the web ui

2010-11-01 Thread Douglas Hubler
i'm not an expert, but i think you have to setup a proxy and not a rewrite. On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Gabe Casey wrote: > is there a setting or ssl crt that needs to be adjusted when doing an > external rewrite of the url to the end user portal from outside the lan. > My goal is to allow ac

[sipx-users] wiki reconstruction

2010-11-01 Thread Douglas Hubler
In preparation for wiki clean-up day on friday, I'm combining all the pages into a simple space. The way it was organized into multiple spaces was not conducive to maintenance. Unfortunately this changes the URL for everything. There be a lot more changes, i just wanted to give everyone a heads up

Re: [sipx-users] Voip.ms

2010-11-01 Thread Tony Graziano
I've never had them go down. I say that while my bandwidth.com trunks have gone down now again (2nd time in 6 months) using ip based. Nice that you can have automated failover with voip.ms. I'd pursue to use a t.38 provider as backup for primary voice and tro carry fax calls.

Re: [sipx-users] Voip.ms

2010-11-01 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 11/1/10 3:42 PM, Todd Hodgen wrote: I am a reseller of Broadvox, and a user of Voip.ms. I don't recommend Voip.ms to customers except for labs, etc. as I find that they are not totally reliable. They are very cost effective, if you have a customer that does not sit at their phone all d

Re: [sipx-users] Voip.ms

2010-11-01 Thread Todd Hodgen
I am a reseller of Broadvox, and a user of Voip.ms. I don't recommend Voip.ms to customers except for labs, etc. as I find that they are not totally reliable. They are very cost effective, if you have a customer that does not sit at their phone all day long, it works great, but if they are on

[sipx-users] Issues with external rewrite of the web ui

2010-11-01 Thread Gabe Casey
is there a setting or ssl crt that needs to be adjusted when doing an external rewrite of the url to the end user portal from outside the lan. My goal is to allow access of the user portal outside the network, however the browser is throwing errors and forcing a logout. voicemail.example.com -

Re: [sipx-users] Voip.ms

2010-11-01 Thread Nathaniel Watkins
It's the only ITSP I've been happy with to date (I've tried 3 or 4). We are running our long distance calls to them and have been very pleased with the quality. We are averaging between 75-125 ld calls per day (approx. 4 hours). I have only used them in a very limited capacity for inbound cal

Re: [sipx-users] Voip.ms

2010-11-01 Thread Josh M. Patten
Good for me so far. They use http://www.theplanet.com/ to host their servers (at least in Texas where I am). The only thing you need to do is ask them if the DID's you're looking to buy/port have the capability of outbound caller ID name. Mine don't so they show up as "Bryan, TX" when I call som

[sipx-users] Voip.ms

2010-11-01 Thread Gary Luca
Hello all, I am planning to implement a new sipX solution for an organization. I set one up for another organization about five months ago and used Broadvox as the SIP trunk provider. I haven't really had any problems with them and the cost is low. But one thing I don't like about them is that

Re: [sipx-users] G.729AB - Freeswitch

2010-11-01 Thread Tony Graziano
This also assumes the ITSP allows or is configured to allow G729. I suspect the ITSP is allowing it, otherwise the call should fail, but not all ITSP's give appropriate error codes (not allowed, etc.). On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Sven Evensen wrote: > Hi James, > > > > Check the SIP trunking

Re: [sipx-users] G.729AB - Freeswitch

2010-11-01 Thread Sven Evensen
Hi James, Check the SIP trunking config, advanced settings. The Permitted Codecs does not include G729 by default Either leave the field blank, or add G729. Sven From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.

Re: [sipx-users] LDAP and Phone Book

2010-11-01 Thread Michael Picher
As Tony mentioned, from a Polycom perspective you do need the Productivity Pack (licensed per station), and you really want to have Soundpoint 450's or better for the larger screens. With the productivity pack and the LDAP look up the contacts are not stored in the phone, they get resolved on the

Re: [sipx-users] G.729AB - Freeswitch

2010-11-01 Thread James Black
Hi Arman, I have subsequently installed with the http://files.freeswitch.org/g729/fsg729-153-installer The AA/Voicemail is now working for internal G729 Calls (over our vpn), however when I get calls coming in from our ITSP, as soon as the call is supposed to get answered, it is just cut

[sipx-users] Request of adding fix to next stable release

2010-11-01 Thread Henry Dogger
Hi, Together with a colleague of mine, we reported a bug namely: http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8309 Since we really needed a fix, we started to fix it ourselves. Could someone confirm that this fixes the problems and add this fix to a next stable release? The patch works for

Re: [sipx-users] ACK misrouted in SipXProxy with Tandberg terminal

2010-11-01 Thread Tony Graziano
Are you able to build a system from the latest snapshot rpm's to determine if the issue is resolved up to the point when the gruu is not behind nat? Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Secu