Re: [sipx-users] 4.4.0 MOH disconnect on second try

Hi Paul, It's perfectly OK to send the capture off-list. Take a look at packet 2026 (200 OK [10.1.128.7 -> 10.1.128.18]). I believe this is the packet from sipX relaying the cisco 200 OK to the polycom. This 200 OK is never ACKed by Polycom and thus, an INVITE is never sent to the MoH to

Re: [sipx-users] sipX AA transfer on failure to another AA

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Josh M. Patten wrote: > No good: > 2011-03-28 16:15:31.358493 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 > sofia/expovoip.bc.local/4676@10.200.31.240 Command Execute > playback(/usr/share/www/doc/stdprompts_en/thankyou_goodbye.wav) > Which means it’s being called from within sipXiv

[sipx-users] SIPfoundry Updates

[image: SIPfoundry] Updates: *Newsletter:* Missed the March 2011 Newsletter? Catch up with some great articles, announcements and event updates. Read our latest Open Connect; Mathew Kitchin, discover our SIPfoundry User Spotlight; Colorado State University and hea

Re: [sipx-users] sipX AA transfer on failure to another AA

No good: 2011-03-28 16:15:31.358493 [DEBUG] switch_ivr.c:563 sofia/expovoip.bc.local/4676@10.200.31.240 Command Execute playback(/usr/share/www/doc/stdprompts_en/thankyou_goodbye.wav) Which means it's being called from within sipXivr directly. I'd rather not blank ou

Re: [sipx-users] Auto-Attendant and Phone Book Transfer without Audio

you've not been very descriptive in your setup or your problem... if you would like people to help try providing clear and concise configuration information, and describe the problem you are having and what you do to create the problem. Things like version of software, type of phone, version of p

Re: [sipx-users] sipX AA transfer on failure to another AA

Sounds like the queue failure music... just record a blank WAV over that. On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Josh M. Patten wrote: > I’ve just run into a strange issue in 4.4 that I’d like to get some input > on how I might resolve this issue > > > > I’d like whenever an auto attendant “transfers

Re: [sipx-users] Auto-Attendant and Phone Book Transfer without Audio

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <58191> Message-ID: I really need to get Auto-Attendant working so that I can get rid of 48 phone lines. I need help in creating a

[sipx-users] sipX AA transfer on failure to another AA

I've just run into a strange issue in 4.4 that I'd like to get some input on how I might resolve this issue I'd like whenever an auto attendant "transfers on failures" to be able to transfer back to the parent auto attendant. As far as I can tell this can only be done with a phantom user forwar

Re: [sipx-users] Exchange 2010 upgraded to SP1 no more AA UM

Ensure IPv6 is off on sipx... if the IP address actually is alphanumeric, it is an ipv6 address. On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Chris Rawlings wrote: > it looks like SipX is sending the ID incorectly .. if i change the Dial > Plan ip address so it will reject the call this is what i get in t

Re: [sipx-users] Exchange 2010 upgraded to SP1 no more AA UM

it looks like SipX is sending the ID incorectly .. if i change the Dial Plan ip address so it will reject the call this is what i get in the event log The Unified Messaging server rejected an incoming call with the ID "1178702165-49041...@ce.bfc.bjd.if". Reason: "No valid UM IP gateway was found w

Re: [sipx-users] Exchange 2010 upgraded to SP1 no more AA UM

On 3/28/2011 11:54 AM, Michael Picher wrote: I'm working on it... but i've been tied up on some other projects... You can see my rant about exchange 2010 in my blog... http://sipxecs.blogspot.com/2011/02/exchange-2010-lync.html I'm sure you have, but just checking. Did you disable IE enhanced

Re: [sipx-users] Exchange 2010 upgraded to SP1 no more AA UM

any tips or tricks that would set this apart from exchange 2010 without SP1 installed.. i had this working flawlessly with no SP1 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Michael Picher wrote: > I'm working on it... but i've been tied up on some other projects... > > You can see my rant about exchang

Re: [sipx-users] Exchange 2010 upgraded to SP1 no more AA UM

I'm working on it... but i've been tied up on some other projects... You can see my rant about exchange 2010 in my blog... http://sipxecs.blogspot.com/2011/02/exchange-2010-lync.html Mike On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Chris Rawlings wrote: > does anyone have a tutorial on setting this up w

Re: [sipx-users] web access problem with 4.4.0.

Did you install from ISO or from RPM? If you installed from RPM you need to disable your firewall / selinux (run setup). Mike On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Tony Graziano < tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote: > Sipxconfig.log should indicate where the problem is. > > >

Re: [sipx-users] Exchange 2010 upgraded to SP1 no more AA UM

does anyone have a tutorial on setting this up with Exchange 2010 SP1 i get very odd issues with the event log now its trying to goto --- An error occurred while transferring a call to "201". Additional information: The call transfer type is "Blind.", the transfer target is "phone number", and the

Re: [sipx-users] web access problem with 4.4.0.

Sipxconfig.log should indicate where the problem is. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.326.5325 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip:

Re: [sipx-users] web access problem with 4.4.0.

Then you should make sure. All the proper services are running and without error. Is the proper network interface attached? Can you ping or arp it from the private network? Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.326.5325

Re: [sipx-users] web access problem with 4.4.0.

Have you changed from the default ssl certs? -Original Message- From: Irena Dolovak irena.dolov...@gmail.com Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:08:16 To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs s

Re: [sipx-users] web access problem with 4.4.0.

No, we can't access it private neither. Connection refused. We tried with telnet to port 80 and got connection refused. On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Can you access it from your private network? > > > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8

Re: [sipx-users] 4.4.0 MOH disconnect on second try

On 03/28/2011 09:46 PM, Paul Curtis wrote: I could use some help on this. I get disconnected the second time I put someone on hold. The first time on hold, ~~moh~ is setup. The second time it starts to but never completes over to ~~moh~. The cisco disconnects (send a BYE) 7 seconds later becau

[sipx-users] 4.4.0 MOH disconnect on second try

I could use some help on this. I get disconnected the second time I put someone on hold. The first time on hold, ~~moh~ is setup. The second time it starts to but never completes over to ~~moh~. The cisco disconnects (send a BYE) 7 seconds later because it never completes. The 2811 thinks its

Re: [sipx-users] web access problem with 4.4.0.

Can you access it from your private network? Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.326.5325 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...

[sipx-users] web access problem with 4.4.0.

Hi, We have a problem accessing web interface of one of the new versions of sipxecs (sipxecs-4.4.0-167.g8be6-x86_64). Sipxecs is installed as a virtual machine in hyper-v environment. It has a private address, but is also accessible through the Internet because it has a dedicated public address,

Re: [sipx-users] Exchange 2010 upgraded to SP1 no more AA UM

I does not look like an ipv4 or ipv4 address at all. The dashes might represent a hostname, but the dotted quads before the dashes bewilder me and make it a nonsensical address altogether. Is ipv6 disabled on the Exchange server or enabled? Either way it sipx should ignore ipv6, I think a sip trace

Re: [sipx-users] Exchange 2010 upgraded to SP1 no more AA UM

On 3/28/11 4:44 AM, Michael Picher wrote: Looks like an IP V6 IP address? An error occurred while transferring a call to "201". Additional information: The call transfer type is "Blind.", the transfer target is "phone number", and the caller ID is: "1023968383_42462764@4.55.5.

Re: [sipx-users] Exchange 2010 upgraded to SP1 no more AA UM

Looks like an IP V6 IP address? An error occurred while transferring a call to "201". Additional > information: The call transfer type is "Blind.", the transfer target is > "phone number", and the caller ID is: "1023968383_42462764@4.55.5. 163-1-0". On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Chris Raw