Re: [sipx-users] Generation of Freeswitch.log

2011-09-11 Thread Kumaran T
Hi Douglas, Thanks for the update.. I'm not expecting the logs to recreate where it left off ...I'm expecting the freeswitch.log file itself should be generated but its not happening.. Scenario: 1.cd /var/log/sipxpbx 2.rm -rf freeswitch.log 3.calling 100 or 101 or OpenAcd

[sipx-users] Simple Signal

2011-09-11 Thread Todd Hodgen
Anyone had experience using Simple Signal as an ISP with sipXecs? Comments good or bad? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Re: [sipx-users] Shared trunks between servers

2011-09-11 Thread m...@grounded.net
I see the whole picture. We have multiple sipx servers on the main lan. They all get their trunks from either the mediant or from SIP trunk providers. If I wanted to use the median's resources to provide it's SIP trunks for a remote sipx server, I just need to deal with the NAT issue. PfSense to

Re: [sipx-users] Shared trunks between servers

2011-09-11 Thread Tony Graziano
PSTN <--PRI--> sipx-branch1 <--ISP--> || VPN Tunnel || sipxbranch2 it should just be a gateway just like the exis

Re: [sipx-users] Shared trunks between servers

2011-09-11 Thread m...@grounded.net
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:54:11 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > either make the remote branch remote users or connect the two sites via vpn > and add the new branch sipx server as acl ti the medians and use it as a > gateway. Thanks very much for the input. I have a better idea of what I am after now.

Re: [sipx-users] Shared trunks between servers

2011-09-11 Thread Tony Graziano
either make the remote branch remote users or connect the two sites via vpn and add the new branch sipx server as acl ti the medians and use it as a gateway. On Sep 11, 2011 1:34 PM, "m...@grounded.net" wrote: >> without explaining what you have now in a way other than "a really good LD >> deal".

Re: [sipx-users] Shared trunks between servers

2011-09-11 Thread m...@grounded.net
> without explaining what you have now in a way other than "a really good LD > deal". LD meaning that with our PRI services, we get a good long distance deal. If possible, I'd like to use our current trunks to provide 4 lines to a remote sipx server. > How about stating how your existing gatew

Re: [sipx-users] Mobile or WEP interface?

2011-09-11 Thread Martin Steinmann
The SOAP API could be extended I think fairly easily --martin -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of thomas peterseil Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 12:24 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs

Re: [sipx-users] Mobile or WEP interface?

2011-09-11 Thread thomas peterseil
Hello Rene, It would be great if you would upload your app to the android market, i am very much interested in your app! Thanks a lot! Thomas Original-Nachricht > Datum: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:07:35 +0200 > Von: Rene Pankratz > An: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software

Re: [sipx-users] Mobile or WEP interface?

2011-09-11 Thread Rene Pankratz
Hi there, last year I have created a simple android app that lets you get and set up call forwardings in an easy-to-use interface. I may upload an old (beta-)revision to android market if someone is really interested on it. But as already said in this thread: The SOAP interface does not offer muc

Re: [sipx-users] Cisco Integration for Voicemail

2011-09-11 Thread Michael Picher
If you see no evidence of a call attempt, change to an unmanaged gateway first. Also check your internet calling settings and make sure the Cisco is inside the internal IP range. Mike On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Stephen Barry wrote: > HI Joe > > Thanks for your help. > > I am running CUCM