Hi All,
Currently for authorization code only sounds are used instead of
prompt.It would be better to have prompt like AA.So it can be easier
and flexible for users..
Regards,
Kumaran T
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
I think the industry standard is to use tones, making it a little more
obscure to surfers who would try to access your account using this method.
http://www.utexas.edu/its/help/long-distance-services/232
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Kumaran T
thiru.venkateshwa...@ezuce.comwrote:
Hi All,
Thanks Tony..
Regards,
Kumaran T
On 10/13/2011 2:39 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
I think the industry standard is to use tones, making it a little more
obscure to surfers who would try to access your account using this
method.
http://www.utexas.edu/its/help/long-distance-services/232
On Thu,
Update #13 : Thu, 13, Oct 2011
==
- ** No security updates in this update **
- ISO has *not* been rebuilt as decided in release policy. Yum update
after installation is recommended for getting these updates.
- Thank you all for your
I have already defined an alarm for the VM login attempts with the existing
attempt limitation(3) in a session.
We may lock the account as in the issue description or block the IP
manually, but may be after a second attempt, i.e. assuming superadmin is
notified with the first.
But I am not sure
On 10/13/2011 8:22 AM, barisyanar wrote:
I have already defined an alarm for the VM login attempts with the
existing attempt limitation(3) in a session.
We may lock the account as in the issue description or block the IP
manually, but may be after a second attempt, i.e. assuming superadmin
is
Well said. Whether sipx has the functionality to auto block an ip for a
specified period or not depends on getting that functionality internally.
If the ip addresses are logged into a file, a remote firewall can
potentially harvest them, and when/if sipx has these functionalities, it
could also.
Weren't e talking about fail2ban more in the context of invalid sip logins
and not invalid vm logins?
On Oct 13, 2011 9:13 AM, Tony Graziano tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
wrote:
Well said. Whether sipx has the functionality to auto block an ip for a
specified period or not depends on getting
On 10/13/2011 9:13 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
Well said. Whether sipx has the functionality to auto block an ip for
a specified period or not depends on getting that functionality
internally.
If the ip addresses are logged into a file, a remote firewall can
potentially harvest them, and
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To: 4e962ac2.3050...@ezuce.com
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 63958
Message-ID: f9d6.4e96e...@forum.sipfoundry.org
Hm, okay, I see.
Thank you very much for clearing
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Gerald Drouillard
gerryl...@drouillard.cawrote:
On 10/13/2011 9:13 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
Well said. Whether sipx has the functionality to auto block an ip for
a specified period or not depends on getting that functionality
internally.
If the ip
Is there a way to get the from email address to be the caller's email
address if known? I find a lot of people are replying to the voicemail
email thinking it is going back to the caller. Or even set the
Reply-To: header?
--
Regards
--
Gerald Drouillard
wow, those are some interesting users you have there...
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Gerald Drouillard gerryl...@drouillard.ca
wrote:
Is there a way to get the from email address to be the caller's email
address if known? I find a lot of people are replying to the voicemail
email
On 10/13/2011 10:43 AM, Michael Picher wrote:
wow, those are some interesting users you have there...
I guess some of them are use to google voice's email message that do
what I describe. With google voice if the telephone number is in your
contacts and that contact has an email address then
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Gerald Drouillard gerryl...@drouillard.ca
wrote:
On 10/13/2011 10:43 AM, Michael Picher wrote:
wow, those are some interesting users you have there...
I guess some of them are use to google voice's email message that do
what I describe. With google voice
Hi all,
I am reviewing 4.4 open items and come across this one, just to double
check - anyone else seeing this issue?
Thanks,
George
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, George Niculae geo...@ezuce.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am reviewing 4.4 open items and come across this one, just to double
check - anyone else seeing this issue?
this one - http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9761
___
It was never designed to put polycom files in the root of http server. I've
added comments to the jira for any that care.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:53 PM, George Niculae geo...@ezuce.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, George Niculae geo...@ezuce.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am reviewing
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
It was never designed to put polycom files in the root of http server. I've
added comments to the jira for any that care.
Thanks Tony, I was not aware of it either. However it looks like is
working for others,
Issue XX-9761 sounds like a new feature and not a bug then. If I recall
HTTP access has been available for certain phone models, such as SNOM, but
Polycom always worked with FTP/TFTP. Security is my main concern with all
these schemes and if we make a step in direction of HTTP we need to think
Probably. Even locally port 80 is redirected to port 8443.
ANY other provisioning method requires a port other than those.
That person probably has a cron job to copy those files, or even move them
to another webserver.
This is not something even I would do though. Polycom has a good deal on
Here is a note from Polycom. It's not a free solution, but it is available
from what they are saying. Don't know about the implementation or
requirements, or compatibility with sipXecs.
Polycom RealPresence Mobile is the first enterprise software solution for
tablets that lets mobile users
Called the real presence platform.
http://www.polycom.com/products/hd_telepresence_video/realpresence_mobile/index.html
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Todd Hodgen thod...@frontier.com wrote:
Here is a note from Polycom. It’s not a free solution, but it is available
from what they are
Polycom contacted me about their stuff but my market isn't enterprise so
expensive solutions never work for me.
Good lead though, thanks very much.
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:03:57 -0700, Todd Hodgen wrote:
Here is a note from Polycom. Its not a free solution, but it is available
from what
24 matches
Mail list logo
