Audiocodes MP114 FXO 6.2 Firmware and SIPXECS 4.4
As the subject reads, I noticed there is a JIRA on this. Does anyone have
MP114's with 6.2 firmware working on SIPX 4.4? I ask because we just ordered 3
new fxos and 3 new fxs and all have 6.2 firmware.
So not sure if this will work or if
I'd downgrade to 6.0
Should be fine...
Mike
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Aaron Pursell aar...@esgw.org wrote:
Audiocodes MP114 FXO 6.2 Firmware and SIPXECS 4.4
As the subject reads, I noticed there is a JIRA on this. Does anyone have
MP114's with 6.2 firmware working on SIPX 4.4? I
I was not sure if I sent it to the correct group. My issue is explained
below.
Thanks,
- Forwarded by Solomon Mohamed/fs/YorkU on 12/08/2011 11:14 AM -
From: Solomon Mohamed/fs/YorkU
To: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
Date: 12/08/2011 07:48 AM
Subject:Conference
In order to auto record, the conference requires an owner.
4.2 is sorely out of date. 4.4 also had issues with auto record but it was
fixed with a patch. You might consider updating your system.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Solomon Mohamed smoha...@yorku.ca wrote:
I was not sure if I sent
upgrade to 4.4.0
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Solomon Mohamed smoha...@yorku.ca wrote:
I was not sure if I sent it to the correct group. My issue is explained
below.
Thanks,
http://www.yorku.ca/
- Forwarded by Solomon Mohamed/fs/YorkU on 12/08/2011 11:14 AM -
From:
Now I guess the question is how to get this from audiocodes, I can't even find
a number to call them to even see how much this will cost us.
Thanks for the info, its what I thought.
Aaron Pursell
Network Systems Administration
Easter Seals-Goodwill Northern Rocky Mountain, Inc.
4400 Central
Thanks to both Michael and Tony for your quick response. I will take your
advise.
From: Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Date: 12/08/2011 11:19 AM
Subject:Re: [sipx-users] Fw: Conference not
You should be able to get through your distributor.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Aaron Pursell aar...@esgw.org wrote:
Now I guess the question is how to get this from audiocodes, I can't
even find a number to call them to even see how much this will cost us.
Thanks for the info, its
You are wise beyond your years.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Solomon Mohamed smoha...@yorku.ca wrote:
Thanks to both Michael and Tony for your quick response. I will take your
advise.
From:Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com
To:Discussion list for users of sipXecs
Hi Guys,
Do you know if there is a way to allow users to access only to CDR reports
from Web Portal ? I'm running version 4.4.
I have users who needs CDR report only, so I don't want to grant them with
superadmin access.
Thanks a lot in advance for your feedback.
Best Regards.
Cyril
We don't have fine-grained control for that sort of thing yet.
CDR's are in a database that you could possibly build your own interface
into.
Mike
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:58 PM, cyril constantin
cyril.constan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
Do you know if there is a way to allow users to
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your answer.
Do you know if it's planned for the future release?
Best Regards.
2011/12/8 Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com
We don't have fine-grained control for that sort of thing yet.
CDR's are in a database that you could possibly build your own interface
into.
Yes i do know...
Multiple levels of admin will be integrated into the admin GUI. Not sure
if in will be in commercial only or both commercial and open source though.
Thanks,
Mike
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:29 PM, cyril constantin cyril.constan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for
Cyril,
Have a look at the sipXconfig 4.4 patch I uploaded for JIRA XX-3474. This might
do what you need it to if you don't mind building your own sipxconfig RPM.
If you decide to try it, use it at your own risk. However, I can say that it's
been working for me in multiple installations
Andrew, does this just use flags in the GUI for menus? How secure is this?
If somebody still knows a URI can they get to it?
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:20 PM, andrewpit...@comcast.net wrote:
Cyril,
Have a look at the sipXconfig 4.4 patch I uploaded for JIRA XX-3474. This
might do what you
Mike,
Good catch. I thought I had nailed all these down, but this version does look
like if you are authenticated and know the URL, it would let you go places you
shouldn't be allowed. Let me go back through my latest customized version and
compare. There should be checks that will boot you
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:51 PM, andrewpit...@comcast.net wrote:
Mike,
Good catch. I thought I had nailed all these down, but this version does
look like if you are authenticated and know the URL, it would let you go
places you shouldn't be allowed. Let me go back through my latest
Thanks George. The restricted parameter looks like it only applies to
situations where the user needs to be superadmin but isn't. I suppose I could
(and probably should) add another boolean parameter in a similar vein for
pbxman and check it in Border anyway to be safe. The thing is, there are
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:41 PM, andrewpit...@comcast.net wrote:
Thanks George. The restricted parameter looks like it only applies to
situations where the user needs to be superadmin but isn't. I suppose I
could (and probably should) add another boolean parameter in a similar vein
for
I've had repeated trouble with the auto-record function...it seems to just stop
working after a while...this has plagued me from past versions and even thru a
clean install...
It seems like it will work if I go back in and change a few settings - but
after a few conference calls, it stops
As in:
div jwcid=@common/Border restrictedToPbxman=true
pbxmanPermission=pbxman-manage-cdr borderTitle=ognl:borderTitle
The isRestrictedToPbxman check in the java code would have to include
superadmin as well:
if (!user.isAdmin() !user.isPBXman() isRestricted()) {
throw new
Oops...
Border.java:
if (!user.isAdmin() !user.isPBXman() isRestrictedToPbxman()) {
throw new PageRedirectException(ManageVoicemail.PAGE);
}
- Original Message -
From: andrewpit...@comcast.net
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:57 PM, andrewpit...@comcast.net wrote:
Oops...
Border.java:
if (!user.isAdmin() !user.isPBXman() isRestrictedToPbxman()) {
throw new PageRedirectException(ManageVoicemail.PAGE);
}
Why not something like:
div jwcid=@common/Border
Just a quick note on Linux firewalls and in this case t.38 aka fax.
We had a issue with t.38 working properly on a new install. Everything
else was fine. We were seeing a 200 ok message from the ITSP on the
phone server just before sending t.38 that was telling the phone server
the
George,
Yes, in this case the extra check for the base pbxman permission is
superfluous, but then again I'm a belt-and-suspenders kind of guy. If a user
has a sub-permission, they SHOULD also have the base permission, and this is
enforced when the user's settings are saved.
A check for just
I think this was our concern with this approach that was used.
We want to have finer-grained control but whatever we do we want it to be
secure and not just security through obscurity.
Thanks for your efforts around this!
Mike
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:51 PM, andrewpit...@comcast.net wrote:
26 matches
Mail list logo
