Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

2012-02-07 Thread Claas Hilbrecht
It is very possible the one created 14 months ago has some custom user settings in it from the menu/interface of the phone. these override the generated config. Wipe the phone to defualts (i.e., 4,6,8,* at bootup with larger polcyoms, try again). I erased the polycom 650 to default, using

Re: [sipx-users] [sipx-dev] No cdr or cse record for forwarded calls

2012-02-07 Thread Domenico Chierico
I've just start a preliminary work on this issue, and i start working on this use case: call forwarding to external number, so A, B and C where C is not local extension, reachable through an unmanaged gateway (so without sbc) what i see is that: A call B, B sends 302 to A but this message is

Re: [sipx-users] [sipx-dev] No cdr or cse record for forwarded calls

2012-02-07 Thread Joegen Baclor
From what i saw, the capture does not make any sense. I don't see the 183 and the 200 you were mentioning. On 02/07/2012 05:49 PM, Domenico Chierico wrote: I've just start a preliminary work on this issue, and i start working on this use case: call forwarding to external number, so A, B

Re: [sipx-users] [sipx-dev] No cdr or cse record for forwarded calls

2012-02-07 Thread Domenico Chierico
Sorry the filter was too strict maybe try with this one On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Joegen Baclor jbac...@ezuce.com wrote: From what i saw, the capture does not make any sense. I don't see the 183 and the 200 you were mentioning. On 02/07/2012 05:49 PM, Domenico Chierico wrote: I've

[sipx-users] Patch to show Enabled/Disabled flag on gateways page

2012-02-07 Thread Luciano Berardi
-- Forwarded message -- From: Luciano Berardi luciano.bera...@sip2ser.it Date: 2012/2/7 Subject: [sipx-dev] (no subject) To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org, sipx-...@list.sipfoundry.org Hi, I just did a patch (sipxecs 4.4) to show in the ListGateway page the Enabled flag. It

Re: [sipx-users] [sipx-dev] No cdr or cse record for forwarded calls

2012-02-07 Thread Joegen Baclor
Ok I see it now. Indeed the responses are never propagated. I can tell from the record routes taht your unmanaged gateway is another sipx. I do remember posts in the past from the old maintainers that 302 initiated by a third party is not advisable because it may conflict with sipx internal

Re: [sipx-users] FW: Alarm SPX00016: The ITSP Account could not be reached

2012-02-07 Thread Gerald Drouillard
On 2/7/2012 2:12 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: realize you cannot do call transfers with the above mentioned method, so your mileage may vary. Yes you can! You have the have the DID configured to come in on 5080. Example voip.ms SIP URI: {DID}@pbx1.example.com:5080 or {DID}@youripaddress:5080

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

2012-02-07 Thread Michael Picher
In sipXecs the non-default settings all have dashes around them. the other thing you could do is check out the config files for differences. Mike On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Claas Hilbrecht claas.hilbrecht+maillinglists.sipx...@linum.com wrote: It is very possible the one created 14

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

2012-02-07 Thread Todd Hodgen
Change the order of the lines on the phone and see if the problem flips lines. -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Claas Hilbrecht Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 1:33 AM To: Discussion list for

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

2012-02-07 Thread Claas Hilbrecht
--Am Dienstag, 7. Februar 2012 08:46 -0500 Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com schrieb: In sipXecs the non-default settings all have dashes around them. Yes, this is a good thing and I used this already to find something, but without luck so far. the other thing you could do is check out the

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

2012-02-07 Thread Claas Hilbrecht
Change the order of the lines on the phone and see if the problem flips lines. Good idea, I will try this. And just to make sure. Is sending a busy on DND something that is supported by sipxecs? Reading the help text on the DND setting I would think so. -- Claas Hilbrecht

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

2012-02-07 Thread Michael Picher
you'll find the phone configs in /var/sipxdata/configserver/phone/profile/tftproot (or something close to this... Mike On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Claas Hilbrecht claas.hilbrecht+maillinglists.sipx...@linum.com wrote: --Am Dienstag, 7. Februar 2012 08:46 -0500 Michael Picher

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

2012-02-07 Thread Tony Graziano
I do recall the #of calls per line key needs to be 1, and voicemail needs to be disabled. If you find NO difference in the configs of the phone, you should peruse the web interface of each phone to see if one (that has not been wiped yet) has a manual setting. I seem to recall that was something I

Re: [sipx-users] On Hold Fails for Inbound Calls through SIP Trunk

2012-02-07 Thread Tony Graziano
Is the provider sending calls to port 5080 or 5060? Who is the provider. Calls need to be sent to port 5080. Does this mean transfers don't work? If so check or ask the provider to send invites to port 5080. On Feb 7, 2012 1:54 PM, Mark Roseboom mark.roseb...@38media.net wrote: Using sipXecs

Re: [sipx-users] On Hold Fails for Inbound Calls through SIP Trunk

2012-02-07 Thread Todd Hodgen
Mark, You will want to provide the name of the ITSP, the model of phones you are using, and the version of firmware they are running on. Brand of router can be helpful as well. Do a search on the wiki at wiki.sipfoundry.org and look up the page on the sipviewer. It will have instructions

Re: [sipx-users] On Hold Fails for Inbound Calls through SIP Trunk

2012-02-07 Thread Mark Roseboom
Currently, the provider is sending calls to 5060, however in our network configuration, the sipxec server is behind a firewall, so I am forwarding port 5060 requests to port 5080 on our sipxec. The provider is IIS Group. You are correct on hold or transfers don't work for inbound calls. Is this

Re: [sipx-users] On Hold Fails for Inbound Calls through SIP Trunk

2012-02-07 Thread Mark Roseboom
Todd, Provider is IIS Group. Phones are Grandstream GXP2000. Firmware is 1.2.2.26. Router is a DD-WRT v24. The download link for the sipviewer .jar file found at http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Display+SIP+message+flow+using+Sipviewer does not work unfortunately so I am unable to use

Re: [sipx-users] On Hold Fails for Inbound Calls through SIP Trunk

2012-02-07 Thread Tony Graziano
Ask them to send invites for inbound calls to port 5080 and make sure the firewall does the same (5080:5080). On Feb 7, 2012 2:06 PM, Mark Roseboom mark.roseb...@38media.net wrote: Currently, the provider is sending calls to 5060, however in our network configuration, the sipxec server is