[sipx-users] Compatible ATA to work Remotely

Guys what do you suggest and works remotely for an analog ATA? Need to do some calls with an analog phone. What plays well with NAT? MP-114 FXS or SPA2102? Thanks in advance ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: ht

Re: [sipx-users] New Release?

I don't need a date, just a time frame. Just wondered if I could hold off on building a server I need to send off. Thanks :) On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 20:37:46 -0400, Nathaniel Watkins wrote: > 'real soon now' - That is the standard open source response on when the > next release will be available. >

Re: [sipx-users] New Release?

'real soon now' - That is the standard open source response on when the next release will be available. This is somewhat unofficial - but it is on the internet...check it out at around 50 seconds... https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SJVmtNEowrM If it makes you feel any be

[sipx-users] New Release?

I noticed someone asking when the new release would be out and I seem to recall the answer being 'soon'. Is soon, a few days, a week, more? Hoping for some idea since I have to send a server out and it might as well have the newest version if I can. Thanks. __

Re: [sipx-users] (no subject)

One more question please: If I returned the login level to Notice, would the root cause of flooding the system with these"Subscribe / 404 Not found / 401 Unauthorized " messages disappear? I am not clear if we are only hiding the issue or completely resolving it. Thank you Saad On Mon, Jun 4, 201

Re: [sipx-users] (no subject)

I see.. I am going to change the login level to Notice and monitor .. Thank you so much Tony On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > This usually means your log level is above notice. > On Jun 4, 2012 3:21 PM, "Saad" wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> We are seeing tons of the following SI

Re: [sipx-users] (no subject)

This usually means your log level is above notice. On Jun 4, 2012 3:21 PM, "Saad" wrote: > Hello, > > We are seeing tons of the following SIP messages in our sipXproxy logs and > want to stop them as it seems to affect the system functionality ( call > dropping, call setup .. etc) .. We are on 4.

[sipx-users] (no subject)

Hello, We are seeing tons of the following SIP messages in our sipXproxy logs and want to stop them as it seems to affect the system functionality ( call dropping, call setup .. etc) .. We are on 4.4 with all yum update in place Regards Saad Time: 2012-06-04T14:08:23.824000Z Frame: 8196 sipxope

Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes Mediant 1000-MSBG and SipXecs webinterfaces

This configuration was being supported by Nortel back in the day. You might want to look around for any Nortel documentation to support it. Maybe in their task planning guides. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael P

Re: [sipx-users] Expected release date for 4.6?

Mike, you forgot to add the trademark: Real Soon Now(tm) On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Michael Picher wrote: > Yes. Real Soon Now. > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Burden, Mike wrote: > >> Does anyone know what the expected release date is for 4.6? >> >> ** ** >> >> [image: Descriptio

Re: [sipx-users] Expected release date for 4.6?

Yes. Real Soon Now. On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Burden, Mike wrote: > Does anyone know what the expected release date is for 4.6? > > ** ** > > [image: Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01C85750.45790B60] > > * **Mike Burden* > > [image: Description: Description: Lynk.g

[sipx-users] Expected release date for 4.6?

Does anyone know what the expected release date is for 4.6? Mike Burden [cid:image002.gif@01CD4234.AA319080] Lynk Systems, Inc e-mail: m...@lynk.com Phone: 616-532-4985 <><>___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfo

Re: [sipx-users] 4.2.1 sends bad 200 OK Contact IP on incoming Trunk calls

I don't know if its on one server or the other. It looks like all incoming calls are going to the primary server as this seems to be the one that has pin-holed the SIP path to BW.com. How can I troubleshoot this? Re-sent the profiles. re: 4.2.1 is this a known bug? _

Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes Mediant 1000-MSBG and SipXecs webinterfaces

I think what you are describing is a matter of your PC with 3 interfaces. BUT at least two of the interfaces are on the same subnet but with two different gateway/routers. The most likely scenario is that you need to change the PC to the same gateway and the AC to see if it is pingable. Why would

Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes Mediant 1000-MSBG and SipXecs webinterfaces

Hello, after trying different things, I had one idea. I scanned the IP Addresses of my network, and it follows that I choosed 192.168.1.10 for AudioCodes server, but after SipXecs installation it changes by itself to other IP address (192.168.1.254) . So, now it's possible to open both interfaces

Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes Mediant 1000-MSBG and SipXecs webinterfaces

Daniel, This firmware is way out of date for the 1000 MSBG. I'd suggest moving up to 6.4 at a minimum. The 1000 MSBG (i.e., the M1000b) is a bit of a different animal and the configuration plugin is not designed to work with it. You may be able to use the M1000 template to get a bit of a leg up

Re: [sipx-users] howto delete phonebook entries

Posted a feature request: http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-10185 From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano Sent: vrijdag 1 juni 2012 13:53 To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users]

Re: [sipx-users] Audiocodes Mediant 1000-MSBG and SipXecs webinterfaces

> > Hello, > I have looked the ARP cache, and after doing ping from my PC to my IP address of AudioCodes Interface (192.168.1.10) I can see that HWaddress is incomplete. I add manually the MAC address but still not working. However the SipXecs server works good (192.168.1.50). I explain you the sc