Re: [sipx-users] Bug fix release update: sipXecs 4.4.0 update #17

Hello, just a quick question. As I mentioned here I have some trouble to get speed dials BLF working on a VPN setup (too much bandwidth is going trough the vpn link). Would it be possible to filter out the BLF request that show the "ringing" information with these kind of plugin? If this is tru

Re: [sipx-users] off-topic - eZuce opening for Solutions Architect

European coast is fine then as well :o) Paul BTW: I am very (as in VERY) close to Rotterdam airport, but our main airport is Schiphol (Amsterdam), bummer :-( Michael Picher wrote on 11-07-2012 01:09:13: > > Not really worried about that at the moment... Will be work from home > & travel whe

Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote: >> Choosing the Date/Time menu produced >> >> An internal error has occurred. Click here >> to continue. > > I could reproduce this,

Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote: > Choosing the Date/Time menu produced > > An internal error has occurred. Click here > to continue. I could reproduce this, i created http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-10262 I'll take

[sipx-users] Bug fix release update: sipXecs 4.4.0 update #17

Update #17 : Tue, 10, Jul 2012 == - ** No security updates in this update ** - ISO has *not* been rebuilt as decided in release policy. Yum update after installation is recommended for getting these updates. - There were numberous commits

[sipx-users] Snom 320 phones not pulling configs

Plugged in three Snom 320 phones after configuring MAC addresses and extensions in sipx 4.6 sipx is not handling DHCP, so I entered the config URL via each phone's HTTP interface. Phones reboot, but no config gets loaded. When I do a wget on http://sipx.domain.com:8090/phone/profile/ddocroot/0

Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)

On Jul 10, 2012, at 15:29 , Douglas Hubler wrote: > > I can disable NTP on the CT, but if sipxecs (at least in the groupinstall) > > has a dependency on ntp, I'd prefer to configure around it so I don't get > > overwritten on a future update. Preferred method > > In ntp settings there's an opt

Re: [sipx-users] sipx on OpenVZ/Proxmox

I'm hoping to put together something just like that, which should apply to OpenVZ in general. Eventually, I'd like to see a sipxecs appliance available which I suspect has the potential to drive a LOT of adoption. The low overhead of OpenVZ (and template virtualization in general) is a good fi

Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)

Maybe a brief wiki page on the do"s and dont's with proxmox and state your user and media server load so people have the proper expectations if they try this also. On Jul 10, 2012 4:56 PM, "Kurt Albershardt" wrote: > On Jul 10, 2012, at 8:29 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: > > >> There seems be to a bu

Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)

Kurt, I'm glad you got things working finally! I'm interested in the results of your testing, as I too use Proxmox for other servers and would love to host my modest 25 user Sipx there as well. If you would share your experiences that would be appreciated. Jeff Gilmore On Jul 10, 2012, at 4

Re: [sipx-users] off-topic - eZuce opening for Solutions Architect

Not really worried about that at the moment... Will be work from home & travel when needed. -- Michael Picher "There are 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't." On Jul

Re: [sipx-users] off-topic - eZuce opening for Solutions Architect

what coast? On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Michael Picher wrote: > Hi guys, > > Sorry for the off-topic... > > eZuce is looking for another Solutions Architect to join the team and we > like to look to the community. Would like somebody with a strong > background in Network Infrastructure. Po

Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)

On Jul 10, 2012 4:57 PM, "Kurt Albershardt" wrote: > > On Jul 10, 2012, at 8:29 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: > > >> There seems be to a bug with ntpd service because of the leap second day. > >> http://serverfault.com/questions/403732/anyone-else-experiencing-high-rates-of-linux-server-crashes-during

[sipx-users] off-topic - eZuce opening for Solutions Architect

Hi guys, Sorry for the off-topic... eZuce is looking for another Solutions Architect to join the team and we like to look to the community. Would like somebody with a strong background in Network Infrastructure. Position will require ~25% travel to start so proximity to a major airport is good.

Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)

On Jul 10, 2012, at 8:29 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: >> There seems be to a bug with ntpd service because of the leap second day. >> http://serverfault.com/questions/403732/anyone-else-experiencing-high-rates-of-linux-server-crashes-during-a-leap-second >> > This may indeed be an issue between the

Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)

On Jul 10, 2012, at 8:18 , Tony Graziano wrote: > Oh ye of little faith. > > http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/10165-problem-with-ntpd-(leap-second-day-bug) > > Re: problem with ntpd (leap second day bug) > Originally Posted by hamed > There seems be to a bug with ntpd service because of the lea

Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)

On Jul 9, 2012, at 18:52 , Tony Graziano wrote: > SINCE this is a Linux host, I think maybe you need a leap second fix for your > kernel. Really, I think that's the problem. Waiting won't help. > There do seem to be a number of reports of Java processes hanging. https://lwn.net/Articles/504658/

Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)

Oh ye of little faith. http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/10165-problem-with-ntpd-(leap-second-day-bug) Re: problem with ntpd (leap second day bug) Originally Posted by hamed There seems be to a bug with ntpd service because of the leap second day. http://serverfault.com/questions/403732/anyone-e

Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)

On Jul 10, 2012, at 7:37 , George Niculae wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote: >> Still trying to understand how a leap second issue might affect a system >> installed, updated, and restarted _after_ July 1st? > > Was the VM created before July 1st? I think run into

Re: [sipx-users] Even fresher install of 4.6

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Kurt Albershardt wrote: > As usual, I did the system update first: > > Built another Centos 6 VM from scratch this afternoon: > > Allocated 3 CPUs and 4GB of RAM to the VM > ran 'yum update' and restarted VM. > Completed 4.6 install per wiki. > > > Still trying to

Re: [sipx-users] Even fresher install of 4.6

As usual, I did the system update first: > Built another Centos 6 VM from scratch this afternoon: > > Allocated 3 CPUs and 4GB of RAM to the VM > ran 'yum update' and restarted VM. > Completed 4.6 install per wiki. Still trying to understand how a leap second issue might affect a system install

Re: [sipx-users] Even fresher install of 4.6

You should always do a yum update to make sure the OS is up to date before a sipXecs install (if installing from RPM) or directly after install if installing from ISO. Also, fyi and just so folks remember, the ISO is not re-created with every build of the code, only when there is a release that th