Re: [sipx-users] Hosted sipx providers

2012-05-23 Thread Mike Pinkerton
ts. With that experience, they might also be a good choice for cloud-based servers. I haven't run a box at Rackspace in years, though. -- Mike Pinkerton On 23 May 2012, at 20:44, Joegen Baclor wrote: > You can get a bare metal box at this price level from iWeb. I've >

Re: [sipx-users] T.38 Recommendations

2012-05-23 Thread Mike Pinkerton
Tony: That volume is way beyond what we will do. Our inbound faxes are very important, but only occasional -- perhaps less than 100 per month. Any suggestion on a trunk provider for a low volume use case? Thanks. -- Mike Pinkerton On 23 May 2012, at 08:12, Tony Graziano wrote: That is

[sipx-users] T.38 Recommendations

2012-05-23 Thread Mike Pinkerton
or she would recommend? If so, are there any peculiar config settings required to work with that provider? Thanks. -- Mike Pinkerton ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Re: [sipx-users] Fedora 16 and 503 Issues from May 14

2012-05-15 Thread Mike Pinkerton
That is a very kind way of saying "foolish move". Before stepping all the way back to Fedora 14, I might try another foolish move -- installing 4.4 stable on Fedora 16 with a couple of Fedora 14 packages thrown in to cover the missing dependencies. If that doesn't work, then I'll go back t

[sipx-users] Fedora 16 and 503 Issues from May 14

2012-05-15 Thread Mike Pinkerton
All: I'm new here -- so apologies if I breach protocol. I am trying to run sipxecs on a standard install of Fedora 16. I tried to install the latest stable, which apparently is a build for Fedora 14, which is past its end of life. That set of packages has dependency issues on Fedora 16.