l it would work. Also,
NOT ALL phones have a reject button.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Venkateshwaran T
<mailto:thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com>> wrote:
Hi Tony,
In my scenario user 200 and 201 is rejecting the call and 202
is the caller..
Regards,
Hi Tony,
In my scenario user 200 and 201 is rejecting the call and 202 is
the caller..
Regards,
Kumaran T
On 11/28/2011 4:21 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
Actually, I don't think that's a valid scenario:
1. Not all sip UA's have a reject button.
2. user 202 cannot reject a forwarded call bec
Thanks for the update George...
Kumaran T
On 11/23/2011 2:22 PM, George Niculae wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2011, Venkateshwaran T
<mailto:thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com>> wrote:
>
> In 4.4.0 its useful in troubleshooting but in 0.0.4.5.2 there is
separate
In 4.4.0 its useful in troubleshooting but in 0.0.4.5.2 there is
separate tab for failed message.So only successful job will be present
in successful job page and failed job will be present in failed job page..
Regards,
Kumaran T
On 11/23/2011 12:37 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
it's nice to b
Thanks for the update Douglas
Kumaran T
On 11/8/2011 7:24 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Venkateshwaran T
> wrote:
>> Any update regarding this.
> IMO i think it's a trivial issue, sorry. T
Douglas,
Any update regarding this..
Regards,
Kumaran T
On 11/8/2011 5:10 PM, Venkateshwaran T wrote:
>
> Yes,I had a doubt so I posted...
>
> Kumaran T
>
> On 11/8/2011 5:05 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Venkateshwaran T
>> w
Yes,I had a doubt so I posted...
Kumaran T
On 11/8/2011 5:05 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Venkateshwaran T
> wrote:
>> I meant in user portal->Address tab(office),Assistant and Assistant
>> phone field are present.So my doubt i
Thanks Tony for the update..I think Douglas would provide some insights
regarding this.
Kumaran T
On 10/20/2011 6:30 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Like I said, I think the thing to do is make sure the IVR knows "+" is
> valid but to ignore it and be aware the call is from the outide. If
> your ITS
The first 3 point I meant was "we have VOIP.MS ITSP and DID number
provide by them was assigned to AA of our server and external caller
calls the DID number and connected to AA.Then external user transfer to 200"
I never tried by your configuration as "FreeSWITCH as SBC".But in my
configu
outbound numbers, you would have it add 00 + the 14 digits to your
> international carrier and it should go out as 00+14 digits on your
> international trunks.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Venkateshwaran T [mailto:thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com]
> Sent: Friday, Octo
Yes,That to make outside calls.My concern is about displaying the caller
-id for outside caller.SipXecs will discard the +.So we cannot call
directly that number from miss call.Because the caller -id is not
proper.Then we want to enter the number with leading 00 or + followed by
the number to c
Thanks Tony..
Regards,
Kumaran T
On 10/13/2011 2:39 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
I think the industry standard is to use tones, making it a little more
obscure to "surfers" who would try to access your account using this
method.
http://www.utexas.edu/its/help/long-distance-services/232
On Thu
rogrammer either).
Mike
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Venkateshwaran T
<mailto:thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com>> wrote:
How about the error message if admin tries to give a password
less than 4?
Kumaran T
On 10/7/2011 1:12 PM, Michael Picher wrote:
I
How about the error message if admin tries to give a password less
than 4?
Kumaran T
On 10/7/2011 1:12 PM, Michael Picher wrote:
I'd say default to 4, let the admin change it to something lower if
they'd like...
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Venkateshwaran T
<mailto:thir
Hi Michael,
My concern is that password will be too small if its 1to3
characters.But it depends on administrator for password length.May be we
can force them to have password move than certain character..
Regards,
Kumaran T
On 10/7/2011 12:57 PM, Michael Picher wrote:
I'll respond the s
Oct 3, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Venkateshwaran T
> wrote:
>> Thanks George..But I tried already thatAnyway now checking the RPM
>> installation.Once its finished I will let you know the update..
>>
> Please also perform some regression tests on CDRs
Thanks George..But I tried already thatAnyway now checking the RPM
installation.Once its finished I will let you know the update..
Kumaran T
On 10/3/2011 1:06 PM, George Niculae wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Kumaran T
> wrote:
>> Hi George,
>> Now I can able to access the s
No problem George..Thanks for the Guidance..
Kumaran T
On 9/30/2011 5:51 PM, George Niculae wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Venkateshwaran T
> wrote:
>> Thanks George.I will check it later once and let you know the update on
>> Monday.Is it fine?
>>
> S
Thanks George.I will check it later once and let you know the update on
Monday.Is it fine?
Kumaran T
On 9/30/2011 5:44 PM, George Niculae wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Venkateshwaran T
> wrote:
>> I created file and restarted mongod but still nogo. OK I will
30, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Venkateshwaran T
> wrote:
>> George,
>> I made mongod running by removing the mongod.lock and start the mongod
>> service..After that what content should be paste in
>> /etc/sysconfig/mongod?Also there is no file or directory called mongod in
file "mongod" in /etc/sysconfig.But still cannot access
sipXconfig..
Regards,
Kumaran T
On 9/30/2011 4:04 PM, George Niculae wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Venkateshwaran T
> wrote:
>> Hi George,
>>Not sure about the error messages in config logs is
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org <mailto:sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
List Archive:http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
--
--Regards,--
--Venkateshwaran T--
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Arc
22 matches
Mail list logo
