On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:56 AM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
> > "What's in a name? That which we call a rose
> > By any other name would smell as sweet."
>
> I vote for SipX (is sipxecs already formally sipx?), since, everyone
> already calls it that :).
>
> Let's see if we have to deal with a name
> "What's in a name? That which we call a rose
> By any other name would smell as sweet."
I vote for SipX (is sipxecs already formally sipx?), since, everyone already
calls it that :).
I'm just an end user, with intentions/hopes of being able to contribute to
features in the future, but for now
>>> Paul Scheepens 07/15/10 10:15 AM >>>
>>>Both versions will be GPL, so both can "borrow"code from each other.
Sipxecs is currently LGPL. Wether or not Avaya keeps openscs under a
compatibile opensource license is up to them. I believe SIPFoundry is not
changing their license for new code.
I think mostly that is right.
I have asked for and think we will get a more concise statement from eZuce
(probably sometime today) to help clarify their part and perhaps the name
thing.
"What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet."
I am not so clear on the
Tony Graziano wrote on 15-07-2010 15:41:09:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:30 AM, m...@grounded.net
wrote:
> > Avaya has expressed a desire to control the messaging of their project
and
> > to control the roadmap, hence the fork from avaya to build upon
sipxecs via
> > the openscs community they
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:30 AM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
> > Avaya has expressed a desire to control the messaging of their project
> and
> > to control the roadmap, hence the fork from avaya to build upon sipxecs
> via
> > the openscs community they are unveiling.
>
> Does the plan include the o
> Avaya has expressed a desire to control the messaging of their project and
> to control the roadmap, hence the fork from avaya to build upon sipxecs via
> the openscs community they are unveiling.
Does the plan include the open source version having less features than the
commercial version?
T
