Ignore this. I didn't have "use local ip address" set ad need to test
against a hardphone for this example. Sorry.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:05 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> this is the pcap from my remote user firewall, for packets destined to the
> sipx server ip address.
>
> sipx-with-public-ip-
Interesting to hear that sipXecs works better for you when behind a NAT.
I would like to take a look at a network trace of your system to
understand why you are not getting the audio on VM calls. Can you run
'tcpdump -n -nn -s 0 -i any -w vm_no_audio.pcap' on your sipXecs,
reproduce the problem an
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Robert Joly wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:16 PM
> > To: Joly, Robert AVAYA (CAR:9D30)
> > Cc: Sipx-dev list; Sipx-users list
> > Subject: Re: [sipX-dev]
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:16 PM
> To: Joly, Robert AVAYA (CAR:9D30)
> Cc: Sipx-dev list; Sipx-users list
> Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] sipxbridge and remote users without
> server behind nat
>
>
>
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Robert Joly wrote:
> > Does sipxbridge have to be behind nat in order for remote
> > users or trunking to work?
>
> Yes as long as you uncheck the 'Server behind NAT' checkbox under
> System->Internet Calling->NAT Traversal. BTW, just to make sure,
> sipXbridge an
> Does sipxbridge have to be behind nat in order for remote
> users or trunking to work?
Yes as long as you uncheck the 'Server behind NAT' checkbox under
System->Internet Calling->NAT Traversal. BTW, just to make sure,
sipXbridge and remote NAT traversal are two different beasts - please
see qu