of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
does bria allow you to set an outbound proxy? polycom has this. so
essentially it will allow you to register
j...@domain.com
at server
server1.domain.com
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:44 AM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com
software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
does bria allow you to set an outbound proxy? polycom has this. so
essentially it will allow you to register
j...@domain.com
at server
server1.domain.com
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:44 AM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't
]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 9:18 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Cc: darthzejdr
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
If you can make Bria insert a Path header in REGISTER, that should solve
your issue. We are discussing a workable solution but there is nothing
final yet
list for users of sipXecs software
Cc: darthzejdr
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
If you can make Bria insert a Path header in REGISTER, that should solve
your issue. We are discussing a workable solution but there is nothing
final yet.
On 10/05/2012 02:57 PM, darthzejdr wrote:
So
] On Behalf Of Douglas Hubler
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 10:22 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
does bria allow you to set an outbound proxy? polycom has this. so
essentially it will allow you to register
j...@domain.com
at server
:* darthzejdr
*Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
Finally I got the trace I need to provide you with an analysis
./Server1/sipregistrar.log-20121004:2012-10-03T11:28:33.730099Z:367:INCOMING:INFO:sipx1.callidus.local:SipClientTcp-31:7f1f8acf5700:SipRegistrar:Read
SIP message:
Local Host
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:59 AM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
Slightly different situation today(the only change i did was to send
profiles and turn on capture database)
First call was from 201(primary server) to 200(secondary server), didn't
work. Thats probably 201@192.168.0.46
-users] 4.6 Cluster
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:59 AM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
Slightly different situation today(the only change i did was to send
profiles and turn on capture database)
First call was from 201(primary server) to 200(secondary server),
didn't work. Thats
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:47 AM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
201sip:201@callidus.local
sip:201@192.168.0.66:56053;transport=TCP;rinstance=fbf9694cbf1534fc;x-sipX-
nonat 2472
200sip:200@callidus.local
sip:200@192.168.0.55:36150;rinstance=25d8170036270c5a;x-sipX-nonat3407
This
Here's what happened to the bad call. Unforutenately, there is not
enough information in the proxy what happened to the call prior to
hitting IVR.
On 10/04/2012 04:53 PM, George Niculae wrote:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:47 AM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
201sip:201@callidus.local
-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Joegen Baclor
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 1:06 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
Here's what happened to the bad call. Unforutenately, there is not enough
information in the proxy what happened
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:20 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately i don't understand those logs. Is there something wrong with
my configuration? Or any ideas what to try next? I am doing yum update now
so will do another try then and see if anything changed.
There is a
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:05 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
So, we've discovered the problem(and a partial solution). It works as it
should only if we're both using udp.
200(Server2, TCP) - 201(Server1, TCP) doesn't work
201(Server1, TCP) - 200(Server2, TCP) doesn't work
-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of George Niculae
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 3:27 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:05 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com
] On Behalf Of George Niculae
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 3:27 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:05 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
So, we've discovered the problem(and a partial solution). It works
]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 5:54 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Cc: darthzejdr
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
Hi,
Thanks for the snapshots. Based on the logs that was available in the
registrar of the secondary node, it was able to redirect properly
...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of George Niculae
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 5:47 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:35 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
Didnt
am calling. For some reason secondary server can't reach
extensions on primary.
From: darthzejdr [mailto:darthze...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 10:49 AM
To: 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
I reinstalled my sipx according
02, 2012 10:49 AM
*To:* 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'
*Subject:* RE: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
I reinstalled my sipx according to your setup.
201 is registered on primary server(with ip address in domain,
92.168.0.46)
200 is registered on secondary server(with ip address
...@ezuce.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 1:22 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Cc: darthzejdr
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
Please send snapshots with both proxy and registrar in debug level.
On 10/02/2012 07:08 PM, darthzejdr wrote:
I've done a few more tests
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:56 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/iwiatrnvkf7fh9a/sipx-snapshot-sipx1.callidus.local.tar.gz
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xwjq7q2px45b4sn/sipx-snapshot-sipx2.callidus.local.tar.gz
calls are:
201 - 200 works
200 - 201 doesn't
] On Behalf Of George Niculae
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 2:00 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:56 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/iwiatrnvkf7fh9a/sipx-snapshot-sipx1.callidus
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:09 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not behind nat, i am in the same subnet as my servers. Also what should
i put in public ip address? Each servers own address, primary server
address, or something else?
You should put each server own address.
George
: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:09 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not behind nat, i am in the same subnet as my servers. Also what
should i put in public ip address? Each servers own address, primary
server address, or something else?
You should put
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:16 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
Changed to ip address, everything is still the same
IMO it really looks like the domain alias issue we seen in latest 4.4
build, will need Joegen's call to be sure
George, the log below is for determining caller-id and has nothing to do
with user or domain alias. For the meantime, can you make something out
of this log. Registrar is unable to route to the user mailbox.
doesn't work
200 - 201@192.168.0.46 mailto:201@192.168.0.46 works
*From:*Joegen Baclor [mailto:jbac...@ezuce.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 02, 2012 1:22 PM
*To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
*Cc:* darthzejdr
*Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
Please send snapshots with both
4:36 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Gerald Drouillard gerryl...@drouillard.ca
wrote:
On 9/27/2012 10:07 AM, darthzejdr wrote:
I'm trying to get clustering to work, but i have some problems. Some
calls
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:01 AM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hf9trlr06dhjrbh/configuration.tar.gz
https://www.dropbox.com/s/beachijue7gaxkf/homer.tar.gz
is this what you mean? I don't understand sip logs(homer), and i started the
service yesterday, so not
...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of George Niculae
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 10:05 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:01 AM, darthzejdr darthze
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:19 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
1st call 201-202 works, both on main server
2nd call 201-200 works, both on main server
Reregistered extensions 200 and 202
3rd call 201-202 doesn't work, 202 on secondary server
4th call 202-201 doesn't work 202 on
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 12:52 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:19 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
1st call 201-202 works, both on main server
2nd call 201-200 works, both on main server
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:31 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
I checked and we didn't use tls. We used bria set on automatic(wireshark
says its on tcp) for this 5 calls. Calls before that were done using tls.
Can you post also the zone file from both machines?
George
set bria to tcp or udp specifically...
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:40 AM, George Niculae geo...@ezuce.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:31 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
I checked and we didn't use tls. We used bria set on automatic(wireshark
says its on tcp) for this 5 calls.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:40 PM, George Niculae geo...@ezuce.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:31 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
I checked and we didn't use tls. We used bria set on automatic(wireshark
says its on tcp) for this 5 calls. Calls before that were done using tls.
: Friday, September 28, 2012 1:58 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:40 PM, George Niculae geo...@ezuce.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:31 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
I checked and we didn't use tls
://www.dropbox.com/s/hrgxivsz033m4tz/sipx-snapshot-sipx2.callidus.local
.tar.gz
-Original Message-
From: darthzejdr [mailto:darthze...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 2:02 PM
To: 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
Zone files
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:14 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
Using bria set to tcp:
201 - 200 doesn't work, different servers (201 - secondary server, 200 -
primary server)
201 - 202 works (both secondary server)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/n1qtbkkawl7arip/homer.tar.gz
28, 2012 2:36 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:14 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
Using bria set to tcp:
201 - 200 doesn't work, different servers (201 - secondary server,
200 - primary server)
201
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:35 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote:
Didnt help. Everything the same. If i try to call extension on second server
i get The user is temporarily unavailable (404 )
That's what I did, let me know if testing scenario different:
- setup cluster with 2 nodes, both
I'm trying to get clustering to work, but i have some problems. Some calls
work, while others don't. I think that the ones that work are people
registered on main server. I thinkDoes anyone have any idea what might the
problem be, and how to fix it? I have sip registrar and dns working on both
On 9/27/2012 10:07 AM, darthzejdr wrote:
I'm trying to get clustering to work, but i have some problems. Some
calls work, while others don't. I think that the ones that work are
people registered on main server. I thinkDoes anyone have any idea
what might the problem be, and how to fix it? I
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Gerald Drouillard
gerryl...@drouillard.ca wrote:
On 9/27/2012 10:07 AM, darthzejdr wrote:
I'm trying to get clustering to work, but i have some problems. Some calls
work, while others don't. I think that the ones that work are people
registered on main server.
43 matches
Mail list logo
