gt;
> - Original Message -
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>
> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org users
> Sent: Mon Jul 12 19:29:12 2010
> Subject: [sipx-users] Actual call transfer, should it work? (polycom ->
> patton)
>
> [see the bottom for versio
tomers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> - Original Message -
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>
> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org users
> Sent: Mon Jul 12 19:29:12 2010
> Subject: [sipx-users] Actual call transfer, should it work? (po
Tony Graziano
To: sip...@eljv.com ; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Sent: Mon Jul 12 19:33:00 2010
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Actual call transfer, should it work? (polycom ->
patton)
I've never done this with an fxs port. The queatuion I have is when you do a
trnasger initiated from an fx
users
Sent: Mon Jul 12 19:29:12 2010
Subject: [sipx-users] Actual call transfer, should it work? (polycom ->
patton)
[see the bottom for versions]
When I receive a call on a subscribed FXS line on a patton 4114 I can flash
and make a 2nd call. The patton manual states that if I then hang u
[see the bottom for versions]
When I receive a call on a subscribed FXS line on a patton 4114 I can flash and
make a 2nd call. The patton manual states that if I then hang up on the second
call the first call should 'transfer' to the destination. I've been unable to
make this work between FXS p
