If somebody can point us to how to make presence work with a park orbit we
could probably move to a FS based park orbit...
I'd love nothing better... :-)
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Tony Graziano tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
wrote:
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8473
Is a good
if we are to change the parking lot setup.. please keep the idea of how it
works now similar
park to an extension ... pickup from extension
i hate the idea of changing evertyhign to the idea of ... park the call...
then it announces what parking lot it is on... that does not work for alot
of my
wheter it is valet or not is not very concerning to me, since FS will not
have to handle the assignments (if sipx can configure it via its gui).
My only point is that I did have a long discussion with the FS developers
regarding presence and that you could add it using the mod_fifo as an
example,
http://fisheye.freeswitch.org/browse/freeswitch.git/src/mod/applications/mod_valet_parking/mod_valet_parking.c
Looks like presence stuff has been added. Now to just tap into it.
Also, FS valet parking hold onto the call, when it should be REFERing it
elsewhere. So after the park is retrieved it
has anyone tried this and then tried to place a call on park more than
once...
i am having the issue as follows
i place a call put it on park .. pick the call up.. put it on park
again... call gets stuck
i may have just not have set this up correctly per the wiki but i doubt it
as the wiki
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8473
Is a good description of what needs to happen on the parking aspect. At
some point perhaps it can be replaced using a FS service or B2BUA.
On Nov 11, 2012 5:45 PM, Chris Rawlings cm.rawli...@gmail.com wrote:
has anyone tried this and then tried to
Can we simply drop in a new FS RPM package to replace the 1.0.7 version
that comes with sipXecs and all the current working stuff will continue to
work?
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Josh Patten jpat...@ezuce.com wrote:
Yes, MoH, ring on transfer, etc. all works in my tests.
On Sun, Nov
Not likely.
At some point we'll probably look to use RPMs now that they are available.
You are of course free to try ;-)
Mike
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Melcon Moraes mel...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we simply drop in a new FS RPM package to replace the 1.0.7 version
that comes with
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Melcon Moraes mel...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we simply drop in a new FS RPM package to replace the 1.0.7 version that
comes with sipXecs and all the current working stuff will continue to work?
There's a good chance it will, and in fact someone reported it worked
How about for remote workers?
- Original Message -
From: Josh Patten jpat...@ezuce.com
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2012 10:58:51 PM
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] FreeSWITCH for SIP Trunking
Yes, MoH, ring
It's not quite that simple. There are a couple of dependency issues with
spidermonkey and js that prevent direct installation, the init script must
be pointed to the new binaries, etc. and when you update all of that breaks.
I believe the newest FS will be integrated into 4.6.1
On Mon, Nov 5,
Douglas Hubler wrote on Mon, 05 November 2012 10:19
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Melcon Moraes
mel...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we simply drop in a new FS RPM package to
replace the 1.0.7 version that
comes with sipXecs and all the current working
stuff will continue to work?
Patten jpat...@ezuce.com
*To: *Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
*Sent: *Sunday, November 4, 2012 10:58:51 PM
*Subject: *Re: [sipx-users] FreeSWITCH for SIP Trunking
Yes, MoH, ring on transfer, etc. all works in my tests.
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 6:00
Why do you say it's unlikely Michael and Josh?
I went out of my way to integrate with standard fs package. We do ignore
all the configuration files that get installed with fs.
On Nov 5, 2012 10:50 AM, Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com wrote:
Not likely.
At some point we'll probably look to
@list.sipfoundry.org
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 10:33:54 AM
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] FreeSWITCH for SIP Trunking
It's not quite that simple. There are a couple of dependency issues with
spidermonkey and js that prevent direct installation, the init script must be
pointed to the new binaries, etc
I ran into a dependency issue with js
spidermonkey required a different version of js than what we provide.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
Why do you say it's unlikely Michael and Josh?
I went out of my way to integrate with standard fs package. We
Just tested the latest RPM version of FreeSWITCH as a SIP trunking
platform, and to my surprise, everything works! All the transfer,
conferencing, parking, etc. scenarios I could throw at it were handled
properly. Here is the setup I used:
Karoo Bridge also uses the FS libraries. What FS lacks is an admin GUI,
just like karoo bridge. Does MOH work in your tests too?
On Nov 4, 2012 4:22 PM, Josh Patten jpat...@ezuce.com wrote:
--
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
sip:
I'd be more than willing to work with someone who is interested in
contributing an admin to Karoo Bridge. Starting version 1.6 Karoo
Bridge will be fully open source with the exception of the media engine
which OSS Software Solutions would license commercially to support the
Karoo Bridge
Yes, MoH, ring on transfer, etc. all works in my tests.
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.netwrote:
Karoo Bridge also uses the FS libraries. What FS lacks is an admin GUI,
just like karoo bridge. Does MOH work in your tests too?
On Nov 4, 2012 4:22 PM,
20 matches
Mail list logo
