Tony Graziano Wrote:
The server, with a public IP address and no firewall, is a bad BAD idea.
I wouldn't do that, no matter who I was.
The sipXecs server will not be behind NAT, but it WILL be behind a
firewall (see below.)
Todd Hodgen Wrote:
If the Server is on a Public Addre
e-
> From: Todd Hodgen [mailto:thod...@verizon.net]
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 4:35 PM
> To: Burden, Mike; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: RE: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX
> withoutgiving public addresses to the phones
>
> If the Server is on a Pu
a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX
withoutgiving public addresses to the phones
If the Server is on a Public Address, and the phones are on NAT
addresses,
how would they get to server without going through a router to get onto
the
same network as the server? That is where your Nat will come in -
trav
: Burden, Mike; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] How to set up a non-NAT'd sipXecs IP PBX
withoutgiving public addresses to the phones
If the Server is on a Public Address, and the phones are on NAT
addresses,
how would they get to server without going through a router t
