I would say, 'it depends'. For production systems there's always that 'if
it works...'. But we need to weigh that with getting folks to test new
updates. For pilot/testing systems, yes, update for all new patches.
Mike
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Melcon Moraes wrote:
> And for new inst
And for new installs on 4.6, should we yum update daily as new packages are
being compiled on a daily basis?
-
MM
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> short answer...
> not officially released
>
> long answer...
> 4.6 is not officially released even though i believe it to
short answer...
not officially released
long answer...
4.6 is not officially released even though i believe it to be more
stable than 4.4. Users that have run into issues with 4.6 may
disagree, because some are finding some issues due to the sheer amount
of changes that went into 4.6 Unfortunat
Hello Jesse,
> I tried searching before asking, however, I could find the answer. Is
[...]
> library still shows that 4.4 is stable and 4.6 is beta. Is that accurate?
I've asked a similar question at 07. Nov. 2012 with the title: "wiki (and
other sites) outdated?" on this list. The answer was s
All,
I tried searching before asking, however, I could find the answer. Is
there a planned live date for 4.6 going stable? The last thing I found in
the archives was someone saying real soon a few months back. The iso
library still shows that 4.4 is stable and 4.6 is beta. Is that accurate?
--