Re: [sipx-users] Is this a valid scenario (RFC-wise)? RTP from different IP than call setup

2011-10-27 Thread Worley, Dale R (Dale)
> From: Tony Graziano [tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] > > My question: If the signalling for the call is established with one IP > address, does a totally different IP address for media break any > rules? No, it doesn't. The endpoint has to listen for media at the address and port specified in th

Re: [sipx-users] Is this a valid scenario (RFC-wise)? RTP from different IP than call setup

2011-10-27 Thread Joegen Baclor
Perfectly legal. The ITSP could be using an ingress proxy to terminate to the switch in which case media and signalling is always different. There is also a possibility of PSTN gateways where each media processor board is equipped with their own ethernet ports which is in most cases is the ca

Re: [sipx-users] Is this a valid scenario (RFC-wise)? RTP from different IP than call setup

2011-10-27 Thread pscheepens
If the ip-address of the RTP stream was specified in the sdp part of the INVITE then all is RFC-OK. Don't know if this answers the question but no one else replied.. Paul > Tony Graziano wrote on 25-10-2011 12:39:02: > I don't think it is, but I wanted opinions. > > I was asked to look at f

[sipx-users] Is this a valid scenario (RFC-wise)? RTP from different IP than call setup

2011-10-25 Thread Tony Graziano
I don't think it is, but I wanted opinions. I was asked to look at flowroute for a potential deployment. After monkeying around with their portal, which has its own quirks, I saw the following behavior... Invite from FR on port 5080 at their ip 216.x.y.z, then I saw the call fail to setup (BYE) f