tests from that PC then.
Do this on both sides.
Mike
From: Rhon [mailto:c4rdi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:09 AM
To: Picher, Michael; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Making SipX to SipX Calls work
Hi Michael,
Sipx to Sipx are working now.
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 21:09 +0800, Rhon wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Sipx to Sipx are working now. Thanks for all your help.
>
> Now our problem is how we can directly call an extension without
> passing the AA.
>
> Any thoughts on how to accomplish this?
perhaps you should write a new description
f *ronald teng
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 15, 2010 2:48 AM
> *To:* sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Making SipX to SipX Calls work
>
>
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Just to update, we applied a quickfix to this problem we're facing by
> chang
rsday, April 15, 2010 2:48 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Making SipX to SipX Calls work
Hi Guys,
Just to update, we applied a quickfix to this problem we're facing
by changing AA numbers for each site. Although now each site would have
to pass thru the
Hi Guys,
Just to update, we applied a quickfix to this problem we're facing by
changing AA numbers for each site. Although now each site would have to pass
thru the AA of the site they're calling to contact a user extension. Still
working on it to see if i can make each site call directly to th
Hi Tonny,
Allow me to answer on my college's behalf since we are on the same project.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> It's always been less problematic for me if I make sure the two boxes
> can resolve each others SRV records from the command line before
> trying to make
Hi Scott,
Thank you for your email. Allow me to answer on my college's behalf.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Scott Lawrence wrote:
>
> Are you trying to make calls work, or are you trying to do BLF across
> these systems? The messages you posted from the log (and _please_ don't
> paste log
ist.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Making SipX to SipX Calls work
>
> You could have probably phrased that better so I didn't think that
Tony
> was actually dead :-P
>
> On 4/14/2010 8:11 AM, Picher, Michael wrote:
> > Yes, Tony's dead on here.
_
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 20:23 +0800, ronald teng wrote:
>Ran into another wall again. I'm having problems making SipX to
> SipX calls.
> Here are some of the steps i took to set this up.
> 1. I made sure that i am able to ping each sipX box's domain name from
> either site.
> 2. In sipX, I setup
Thanks for your support Josh. The reports of my demise are premature.
I did have to be revived after meeting the CPA to sign off... but I am
alive (sort of).
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
> You could have probably phrased that better so I didn't think that Tony
> was actuall
You could have probably phrased that better so I didn't think that Tony
was actually dead :-P
On 4/14/2010 8:11 AM, Picher, Michael wrote:
> Yes, Tony's dead on here.
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.s
ginal Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:27 AM
> To: ronald teng
> Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Making SipX to SipX C
It's always been less problematic for me if I make sure the two boxes
can resolve each others SRV records from the command line before
trying to make dial plans work.
If they are on two different domains and connected via the open
Internet, they shouldn;t resolve to private IP addresses at all, th
Hi All,
Ran into another wall again. I'm having problems making SipX to SipX
calls.
Here are some of the steps i took to set this up.
1. I made sure that i am able to ping each sipX box's domain name from
either site.
2. In sipX, I setup an unmanaged gateway as per instructions from the
sipXecs
14 matches
Mail list logo
