Re: [sipx-users] Multiple WANs with PfSense, One SipX

2009-11-12 Thread Tony Graziano
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:36 PM, li...@grounded.net wrote: > > when you ran opensbc IT was the NAT traversal device instead of pfsense > > is all. > > One very big difference is that now I'm using pfsense, which is a firewall. > The only > option I seem to have is pfsense in multi wan setup since

Re: [sipx-users] Multiple WANs with PfSense, One SipX

2009-11-11 Thread li...@grounded.net
> when you ran opensbc IT was the NAT traversal device instead of pfsense > is all. One very big difference is that now I'm using pfsense, which is a firewall. The only option I seem to have is pfsense in multi wan setup since sipx can only have one default gateway. Unless of course, I might b

Re: [sipx-users] Multiple WANs with PfSense, One SipX

2009-11-11 Thread Tony Graziano
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:37 AM, li...@grounded.net wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:37:04 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: > > You have to decide what you want to do with the multiple servers. > > I know what I'd like to accomplish, fail over on the front end (WAN sides), > and > reliability, high ava

Re: [sipx-users] Multiple WANs with PfSense, One SipX

2009-11-11 Thread li...@grounded.net
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:37:04 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: > You have to decide what you want to do with the multiple servers. I know what I'd like to accomplish, fail over on the front end (WAN sides), and reliability, high availability on the back end (sipx). I'm asking questions to understand c

Re: [sipx-users] Multiple WANs with PfSense, One SipX

2009-11-11 Thread Tony Graziano
You have to decide what you want to do with the multiple servers. One one can be the master, all of the others are considered "distributed". If they are both going to have users directly on them registering, then they can both have the same gateway configured. Name Status Role Park Running Prim

Re: [sipx-users] Multiple WANs with PfSense, One SipX

2009-11-11 Thread li...@grounded.net
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:46:18 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: > psense can be run in clustered mode OR it can be run with dual wan > support.CARP (harware failover) is supported and state table sync (pfsync, Yes, I was reading about that last night and have it in my browser tabs actually. I was just

[sipx-users] Multiple WANs with PfSense, One SipX

2009-11-10 Thread li...@grounded.net
I've been looking high and low to try and get a handle on this. I was using opensbc in front of the sipx box. The beauty of this was that the sipx box didn't need NAT traversal so it was easy to add entry points, load balance/fail over using DNS. Since I am now using PfSense firewalls, I need