Re: [sipx-users] My time with sipx

2009-10-21 Thread Tony Graziano
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Mark Eissler wrote: > I've taken a look at sipX a few times over the past couple of years to > see if it could replace an Asterisk-based system. Here are my thoughts. > > When people say "Trixbox" they really mean two things: 1) the ISO; 2) > the FreePBX GUI. The

Re: [sipx-users] My time with sipx

2009-10-21 Thread M. Ranganathan
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Keith Gearty wrote: > Picher, Michael wrote: > > >There's no doubt that Trixbox is good for very small installations. It > >has a lot of functionality and can be easy to setup. For those two > >reasons alone it can make a lot of sense for home users. > > > >For

Re: [sipx-users] My time with sipx

2009-10-21 Thread Mark Eissler
I've taken a look at sipX a few times over the past couple of years to see if it could replace an Asterisk-based system. Here are my thoughts. When people say "Trixbox" they really mean two things: 1) the ISO; 2) the FreePBX GUI. The drag about Asterisk is that until GUIs came along the thing was

Re: [sipx-users] My time with sipx

2009-10-20 Thread Keith Gearty
Picher, Michael wrote: >There's no doubt that Trixbox is good for very small installations. It >has a lot of functionality and can be easy to setup. For those two >reasons alone it can make a lot of sense for home users. > >For those of us with corporate responsibilities sipXecs is a more robust

Re: [sipx-users] My time with sipx

2009-10-19 Thread Mark Wood
Message- From: Dale Worley [mailto:dwor...@nortel.com] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 12:53 PM To: William Otten Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] My time with sipx On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 02:03 -0400, William Otten wrote: > When it comes down to it, if you are a home u

Re: [sipx-users] My time with sipx

2009-10-19 Thread Dale Worley
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 02:03 -0400, William Otten wrote: > When it comes down to it, if you are a home user, what's best Sipx or > Trixbox? >From what I've seen, Asterisk (Trixbox) has an advantage in small systems (less than 10 users or so) because it can use the Digium board to interface to a sm

Re: [sipx-users] My time with sipx

2009-10-17 Thread Picher, Michael
-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of William Otten Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 2:04 AM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: [sipx-users] My time with sipx OK guys My SipXecs experience: When it comes down to it, if you are a home user, what's be

Re: [sipx-users] My time with sipx

2009-10-17 Thread Tony Graziano
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 2:13 AM, dimitris wrote: > On 10/17/2009 09:03 AM, William Otten wrote: > > OK guys > > My SipXecs experience: > > When it comes down to it, if you are a home user, what's best Sipx or > > Trixbox? You have to ask yourself, what's most important? IM with video > > or voice

Re: [sipx-users] My time with sipx

2009-10-16 Thread dimitris
On 10/17/2009 09:03 AM, William Otten wrote: > OK guys > My SipXecs experience: > When it comes down to it, if you are a home user, what's best Sipx or > Trixbox? You have to ask yourself, what's most important? IM with video > or voice mail attachments if you have a pubic ip address? Also what >

[sipx-users] My time with sipx

2009-10-16 Thread William Otten
OK guys My SipXecs experience: When it comes down to it, if you are a home user, what's best Sipx or Trixbox? You have to ask yourself, what's most important? IM with video or voice mail attachments if you have a pubic ip address? Also what about the ease of installation and use. I choose Trixb