From: Paul Mossman [mailto:paul.moss...@nortel.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 9:14 PM
To: Picher, Michael; Josh Patten; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Polycom Firmware 3.2.1
Mike wrote:
> I figured that's how we'd have to do it... I just wasn
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Paul Mossman wrote:
>
> 1. Upgrading Polycom firmware will become more manual that other phones.
> Would the inconsistency be too confusing? Would it be too inconvenient?
> (Though, a default "all" Phone Group would remove much of the
> inconvenience.)
>
> 2. I do
Mossman
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 6:14 PM
To: Picher, Michael; Josh Patten; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Firmware 3.2.1
Mike wrote:
> I figured that's how we'd have to do it... I just wasn't
> sure if the dev team was hatching
Mike wrote:
> I figured that's how we'd have to do it... I just wasn't
> sure if the dev team was hatching a scheme for multiple
> versions of Polycom firmware being active on the PBX.
Scott and I have talked about how to do it, but there are currently no
plans.
I can open a JIRA, but let's fi
ober 16, 2009 4:21 PM
To: Picher, Michael; Josh Patten; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Polycom Firmware 3.2.1
Mike wrote:
> If that's true, how will we deal with a mixed environment of phones?
Legacy phones will simply not download 3.2.X firmware. This is Polycom
Mike wrote:
> If that's true, how will we deal with a mixed environment of phones?
Legacy phones will simply not download 3.2.X firmware. This is Polycom
BootROM behaviour.
On the sipXecs side, the config files generated for these models are
compliant with Polycom 3.1.3RevC. (The latest 3.1.X.)
users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Firmware 3.2.1
Josh wrote:
> It appears Polycom Firmware 3.2.1 is now available to the
> general public. Are there currently plans to get sipXconfig
> outfitted with the newest config options in sipX 4.2 or will
> that have to w
Josh wrote:
> It appears Polycom Firmware 3.2.1 is now available to the
> general public. Are there currently plans to get sipXconfig
> outfitted with the newest config options in sipX 4.2 or will
> that have to wait until a later release?
Done. (I'm hoping to ultimately support Polycom 3.2
It appears Polycom Firmware 3.2.1 is now available to the general
public. Are there currently plans to get sipXconfig outfitted with the
newest config options in sipX 4.2 or will that have to wait until a
later release? It appears that Polycom has implemented fixes to some
enhanced BLF issues I