Caller id is showing up as:
From: Your Name
3013341...@192.168.103.5
I thought disabling uri dialing would get rid of the @x.x.x.x (the internal
address of my patton PRI gateway) - but it still shows up.
This message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the
individual(s) or
The C model is for use with CUCM. The D model is dual stack so you can
call both H.323 and SIP systems.
Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
> Anyone know the difference between the VVX 1550 revisions (I've seen C/D)?
> Any issues with a more recent version and sipxecs?
>
> This message and any files trans
Anyone know the difference between the VVX 1550 revisions (I've seen C/D)? Any
issues with a more recent version and sipxecs?
This message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the
individual(s) or entity named. If you are not the intended individual(s) or
entity named you ar
>>> On 9/8/2009 at 9:52 AM, in message
>>> <87ac5f88f03e6249aea68d40bd3e00be1c065...@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>, "Paul
>>> Mossman" wrote:
>>
>>Hi Matt,
>>
>>The VVX profile in complete in 4.2, but not in 4.0.1.
>>
>>I've used these phones, they work well. They use the same firmware as the
>
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Polycom VVX 1500
I have a client looking at adding several Polycom VVX 1500 video
phones to their current 4.0.1 polycom setup.
It looks like the profile for VVx phones is not complete, but I'
not too wor
I have a client looking at adding several Polycom VVX 1500 video phones to
their current 4.0.1 polycom setup.
It looks like the profile for VVx phones is not complete, but I' not too
worried about that.
Has anybody used these video phones yet? The customer wants to be sure BLF,
paging, int
