This is why I use subdomains for sipx with xmpp, and in general, I can get
around some phones that do not properly support SRV lookup and NOT interfere
with the normal user expectations of "the boss wants to go to the website by
pulling up his bookmark of the domain name" (i.e. not having to type "
I agree Paul, this might be the case...
Tony, yea the other complication with Google Apps is if your top level
domain is hosted there they own your xmpp records. So if you try to
re-route your xmpp srv records to your sipxecs install users in the
gmail.com or any other google hosted domain will n
This is a problem with the newest versions of Spark (old version seems to
work fine). Pidgin seems to work fine. Beem on Android exhibits the same
problem as the new Spark.
The only problem with this is that it blows holes in a single point of
contact (u...@domain = sip uri, e-mail and IM contac
If I assume "the newest version of Spark" is 2.6.0 Beta2,
then combining your and my info I would conclude that the problem exists
only when the full hostname is an extension of the xmpp domain.
So
xmpp domain xmpp.example.com with hostname host.example.com is OK
xmpp domain example.com with host
I don't see what's problematic if there is no problem in the first place.
First, spark does support SRV's, so no preblem there.
Second, according to Douglas hostname needs to be XMPP domain name, so I
started to verify this.
I can't find the XMPP-domain==hostname relation.
I did the following
It's more problematic if this is going to be the standard way they do things
going forward. It more likely means that using DNS to overcome it is the
easier solution if the openfire folks are not going to accept a change. This
would mean the superadmin would need to be able to maintain some A recor
I traced and see no problemo with Spark.
Attached a wireshark with filter "port 53" during the start of
spark2.6.0b2 after I did an c:>ipconfig /flushdns.
Unfortunately my SRV and A record are the same, but that's normal when
you're a Bria user :o)
Paul
Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Wed, Nov
