On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 14:18 -0300, Melcon Moraes wrote:
> Not sure I understand. "It changes more smoothly" means the CentOS
> distro repository or the sipX repo for CentOS?
I was referring mostly to the base CentOS repository. The sipXecs
builds should be functionally the same.
Ideally, our go
Not sure I understand. "It changes more smoothly" means the CentOS
distro repository or the sipX repo for CentOS?
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Scott Lawrence
wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 18:04 -0500, Kevin Thorley wrote:
>> I am working on setting up a sipx server for use by my local Linu
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 10:28 -0500, Scott Lawrence wrote:
[...]
>
> If you plan to keep using this system for any length of time, you should
> probably use CentOS, not Fedora. It changes more smoothly and less
> frequently, so dependency management is much easier.
>
>
Ok, thanks, I'll look int
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 18:04 -0500, Kevin Thorley wrote:
> I am working on setting up a sipx server for use by my local Linux users
> group. We plan to use it to provide dial in numbers for our meetings
> for those that can't be there in person. Someone had originally
> suggested using * for this,
I am working on setting up a sipx server for use by my local Linux users
group. We plan to use it to provide dial in numbers for our meetings
for those that can't be there in person. Someone had originally
suggested using * for this, but since I volunteered to set it up, I
chose to use sipx. Yay
