uff should drop
>>>>>> in mid to late December... we'll want some testers on the 4.7 branch.
>>>>>> We'll probably be dog-fooding it once 4.6 drops too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There might be a couple other phones in the works
nsight.
--
Geoff
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 1:25 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Yealink SIP-T26P/T28P + EXP38
Shoot thyself in the foot. Snom or Yealink, both are p
gt;>
>>>>> There might be a couple other phones in the works too ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Geoff Musgrave <
>>>>> geoff.musgr...@cacionline.net>
; Thanks for the replies. I had a feeling that was going to be the kind
>>>>> of response I got but wanted to check first.
>>>>>
>>>>> ** **
>>>>>
>>>>> I completely agree that going with Polycoms would solve all of our
>
to check first.
I completely agree that going with Polycoms would solve all of our
problems.
Thanks for the info/insight.
--
Geoff
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 1:25 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs softwa
gt;> Mike/Tony,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the replies. I had a feeling that was going to be the kind
>>>>> of response I got but wanted to check first.
>>>>>
>>>>> ** **
>>>>>
>>
: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
(sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org)
Subject: [sipx-users] Yealink SIP-T26P/T28P + EXP38
Has anyone used the Yealink SIP-T26P or T28P with or without the EXP38 with
sipXecs 4.6? If so, I would like to hear your experience and/or opinion.
I'm consid
ms would solve all of our
>>>> problems.
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the info/insight.
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Geoff
>>&
th Polycoms would solve all of our
>>> problems.
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Thanks for the info/insight.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Geoff
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>
t; --
>>
>> Geoff
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 20, 2012 1:25 PM
>> *To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
>> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Yeal
gt; --
>
> Geoff
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 20, 2012 1:25 PM
> *To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Yealink SIP-T26P/T28P + EXP38
>
> ** **
...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 1:25 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Yealink SIP-T26P/T28P + EXP38
Shoot thyself in the foot. Snom or Yealink, both are problematic. Get thee to a
Polycom...
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Geoff Musgrave
Shoot thyself in the foot. Snom or Yealink, both are problematic. Get thee
to a Polycom...
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Geoff Musgrave <
geoff.musgr...@cacionline.net> wrote:
> Has anyone used the Yealink SIP-T26P or T28P with or without the EXP38
> with sipXecs 4.6? If so, I would like to
Sounds like you're trading one problem for another...
Still issues with bridged line appearance and the NAT traversal on those
phones may be in question.
My $0.02. YMMV
Mike
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Geoff Musgrave <
geoff.musgr...@cacionline.net> wrote:
> Has anyone used the Yealink
Has anyone used the Yealink SIP-T26P or T28P with or without the EXP38 with
sipXecs 4.6? If so, I would like to hear your experience and/or opinion.
I'm considering placing 2 of these with the EXP38 at another office due to the
owners not wanting to spend Polycom prices. My other option is to g
15 matches
Mail list logo
