On 4/20/11 11:24 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
looks like (almost random) decisions on the sipx 4.2.0 dial plans on
how it matches 'near match' plans.
It is not like you can 'stack' dial plans in priority order.
Looking to (better) implement E.164 dial translations on sipx 4.2.0
without an SB
On 4/20/11 11:24 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
looks like (almost random) decisions on the sipx 4.2.0 dial plans on
how it matches 'near match' plans.
It is not like you can 'stack' dial plans in priority order.
it looks like its more of a 'best match first' type of thing. (so you
would need t
looks like (almost random) decisions on the sipx 4.2.0 dial plans on how
it matches 'near match' plans.
It is not like you can 'stack' dial plans in priority order.
it looks like its more of a 'best match first' type of thing. (so you
would need to know the internals before you can actually pr
