Re: [sipx-users] what is the proper carrier behavior?

2011-09-14 Thread Tony Graziano
by the way it was good to hear from you dale. and thanks. On Sep 14, 2011 3:36 PM, "Tony Graziano" wrote: > then this confirms why flowroute is such a problem for some. > On Sep 14, 2011 3:25 PM, "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" wrote: >>> From: Tony Graziano [tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] >>> >>> if I m

Re: [sipx-users] what is the proper carrier behavior?

2011-09-14 Thread Tony Graziano
then this confirms why flowroute is such a problem for some. On Sep 14, 2011 3:25 PM, "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" wrote: >> From: Tony Graziano [tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] >> >> if I make a call to a carrier and send the invite and also send sdp, >> is it proper for the carrier to send back aight r

Re: [sipx-users] what is the proper carrier behavior?

2011-09-14 Thread Worley, Dale R (Dale)
> From: Tony Graziano [tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] > > if I make a call to a carrier and send the invite and also send sdp, > is it proper for the carrier to send back aight reinvite with a new > sdp even though no session has actually been established? and then > turn around and tell me my offe

[sipx-users] what is the proper carrier behavior?

2011-09-14 Thread Tony Graziano
if I make a call to a carrier and send the invite and also send sdp, is it proper for the carrier to send back aight reinvite with a new sdp even though no session has actually been established? and then turn around and tell me my offer is not acceptable after they send me to reinvite?