On May 28, 2012, at 3:14 AM, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
>> It is like news server operation. New servers are completely independent.
>> It is always the matter of local policy what newsgroups and what articles
>> are received and sent from/to what peer partners. Accepting centralized
>> control me
On 2012-05-28 at 09:14 +0200, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
> BTW. What if a newsgroup called alt.gpg.keys was used as an alternate
> channel aside gossip protocol to distribute keys? NNTP transfers zillions
> of news articles within seconds from Buenos Aires to Tokyo. It is
> quite reliable too.
Yo
> It is like news server operation. New servers are completely independent.
> It is always the matter of local policy what newsgroups and what articles
> are received and sent from/to what peer partners. Accepting centralized
> control messages is also based on digital signatures and local
> decisi
> Plus, the instant there's a committee the committee members will likely
> become legally responsible for the content of the network. If someone
Mostly you are right.
However this legal issue can be solved if the individual SKS server
operators may decide if they accept the comittee's suggestio