Re: [Sks-devel] 0xd5920e937cc1e39b shows signatures with 0xca57ad7c continuing?

2012-05-28 Thread Gabor Kiss
> Plus, the instant there's a committee the committee members will likely > become legally responsible for the content of the network. If someone Mostly you are right. However this legal issue can be solved if the individual SKS server operators may decide if they accept the comittee's suggestio

[Sks-devel] Keys over NNTP

2012-05-28 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
> It is like news server operation. New servers are completely independent. > It is always the matter of local policy what newsgroups and what articles > are received and sent from/to what peer partners. Accepting centralized > control messages is also based on digital signatures and local > decisi

Re: [Sks-devel] Keys over NNTP

2012-05-28 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2012-05-28 at 09:14 +0200, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote: > BTW. What if a newsgroup called alt.gpg.keys was used as an alternate > channel aside gossip protocol to distribute keys? NNTP transfers zillions > of news articles within seconds from Buenos Aires to Tokyo. It is > quite reliable too. Yo

Re: [Sks-devel] Keys over NNTP

2012-05-28 Thread David Shaw
On May 28, 2012, at 3:14 AM, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote: >> It is like news server operation. New servers are completely independent. >> It is always the matter of local policy what newsgroups and what articles >> are received and sent from/to what peer partners. Accepting centralized >> control me