> Plus, the instant there's a committee the committee members will likely > become legally responsible for the content of the network. If someone
Mostly you are right. However this legal issue can be solved if the individual SKS server operators may decide if they accept the comittee's suggestion or not. And what signatures are considered valid. It is like news server operation. New servers are completely independent. It is always the matter of local policy what newsgroups and what articles are received and sent from/to what peer partners. Accepting centralized control messages is also based on digital signatures and local decision. But I repeat ou are right. Basically this was not a good idea of me. :-) Gabor _______________________________________________ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
