On May 18, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2012-05-19 00:02, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On May 18, 2012, at 5:58 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
>>
>> Does she have a fingerprint registered in SKS key servers?
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2012-05-19 00:02, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
> On May 18, 2012, at 5:58 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
> Does she have a fingerprint registered in SKS key servers?
>
In fact, she does have her own OpenPGP key :)
- --
- --
On 05/18/2012 02:52 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
> And wouldn't patience to see whether there actually
> is a SKS fork, with a need to specify forked version pool acceptance
> criteria, perhaps with administrative delegation to inter-continental
> and inter-national naming authorities, registered/
On May 18, 2012, at 5:58 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
> If not, I take the liberty to exclude any keyserver being
> non-compliant from the pool.
>
Yo mamma gave you that right and privilege when you were born ;-)
Does she have a fingerprint registered in SKS key servers?
73 de Jeff
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2012-05-18 23:52, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
> On May 18, 2012, at 4:43 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
>>
>> I have started pondering on policy regarding a possible fork and
>> its criteria for inclusion in the main pool of
>> sks-keyservers.
On May 18, 2012, at 4:43 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
> I have started pondering on policy regarding a possible fork and its
> criteria for inclusion in the main pool of sks-keyservers.net
>
Do these questions need explicit answers?
Even if an answer for how to handle version forks were
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2012-05-15 03:55, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 5/14/2012 9:41 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
>> I hereby inquire as to the availability of source code for your
>> release.
...
>
> I'm not one of these people who believes forks are evil and must
> be a
Am Mon, 14 May 2012 21:55:46 -0400
schrieb "Robert J. Hansen" :
Hi,
> So, my requests:
>
> 1. Source code
> 2. Change of name
> 3. An end to all this useless squabbling
Jens and i will have a talk about it and get back to you.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Yours sincerely
Gabor Kiss wrote:
>> > So, my requests:
>> >
>> >1. Source code
>> >2. Change of name
>> >3. An end to all this useless squabbling
>
>> I would like to support this idea wholeheartedly.
>
> Me too. Not necessarily in this order.
One addition:
4. Remove slanderous^W libelous pe
Gabor Kiss wrote:
>> > So, my requests:
>> >
>> >1. Source code
>> >2. Change of name
>> >3. An end to all this useless squabbling
>
>> I would like to support this idea wholeheartedly.
>
> Me too. Not necessarily in this order.
One addition:
4. Remove slanderous personal atta
> > So, my requests:
> >
> > 1. Source code
> > 2. Change of name
> > 3. An end to all this useless squabbling
> I would like to support this idea wholeheartedly.
Me too. Not necessarily in this order.
Gabor
___
Sks-devel mailing list
On 05/15/2012 03:55 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
[...]
So, my requests:
1. Source code
2. Change of name
3. An end to all this useless squabbling
Hi,
I would like to support this idea wholeheartedly.
D.
--
NAME:Dinko.kreator.Korunic DISCLAIMER:Standard.disclaim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 5/14/2012 9:41 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
> I hereby inquire as to the availability of source code for your
> release.
Although I'm neither an SKS maintainer nor a Debian SKS administrator, I
have to say the lack of source code confuses me. There a
On 2012-05-14 at 09:57 +0200, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
> Another exiting Debian Binary Replacement has been released, As usual
> you can find it right here:
>
> http://key-server.org/sks/
(1) In compliance with the GPL,
(2) as a contributor of code under the GPL license which has been
included
On 2012-05-14 at 09:57 +0200, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
> Another exiting Debian Binary Replacement has been released, As usual
> you can find it right here:
>
> http://key-server.org/sks/
(1) In compliance with the GPL,
(2) as a contributor of code under the GPL license which has been
included
Sebastian Urbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another exiting Debian Binary Replacement has been released, As usual
> you can find it right here:
>
> http://key-server.org/sks/
>
> The "You talk, we work" release:
Exiting. How exciting!
Yes, but while talking and discussing changes to be made with the ent
Sebastian Urbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another exiting Debian Binary Replacement has been released, As usual
> you can find it right here:
>
> http://key-server.org/sks/
>
> The "You talk, we work" release:
Exiting. How exciting! Does it run long before exiting?
Yes, but while talking and discussin
Hi,
Another exiting Debian Binary Replacement has been released, As usual
you can find it right here:
http://key-server.org/sks/
The "You talk, we work" release:
1.1.4
- Introduced new path variables to make SKS FHS compatible:
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/lsb/fhs
18 matches
Mail list logo
