> I noticed that there is a google-talk SlackBuild in pending. Could
> the author (or one of the admins) please e-mail me the tarball as I
> need to get it up and running for tomorrow and this way I wouldn't
> have to re-invent the wheel.
There isn't any tarball for google-talk as they only provi
> I'm guessing it is the one mentioned at linuxquestions.org under the
> Slackware forum.
>> I noticed that there is a google-talk
>> SlackBuild in pending. Could
>> the author (or one of the admins) please e-mail me the
>> tarball as I
>> need to get it up and running for tomorrow and this way
ipython.Slackbuild
... ...
# Install documentation:
mkdir -p $PKG/usr/doc
mv $PKG/usr/share/doc/ipython $PKG/usr/doc/ipython-$VERSION
chmod -R 0644 $PKG/usr/doc/$PKGNAM-$VERSION/*
... ...
The 'chmod' line made the fault, which caused normal users not able to enter
into the directories of ipython-$
I'm guessing it is the one mentioned at linuxquestions.org under the Slackware
forum.
--- On Thu, 8/26/10, alkos333 wrote:
> From: alkos333
> Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Google Talk SlackBuild
> To: "SlackBuilds.org User List"
> Date: Thursday, August 26, 2010, 6:16 PM
> I noticed that there
On (18:48 26/08/10), xgiz...@slackbuilds.org put
forth the proposition:
On Thursday 26 August 2010 18:36:32 David Woodfall wrote:
On (10:09 22/08/10), emmel put forth the proposition:
>What are the opinions on including the DIB engine patch in the build? It
>has to be enabled manually anyway
I noticed that there is a google-talk SlackBuild in pending. Could
the author (or one of the admins) please e-mail me the tarball as I
need to get it up and running for tomorrow and this way I wouldn't
have to re-invent the wheel.
Thanks a lot in advance.
--
Alex Lysenka
Bachelor of Science
Com
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:36:32PM +0100, David Woodfall wrote:
> On (10:09 22/08/10), emmel put forth the proposition:
> >What are the opinions on including the DIB engine patch in the build? It
> >has to be enabled manually anyway (environment variable WINEDIB=on), so
> >there shouldn't be any t
On Thursday 26 August 2010 18:36:32 David Woodfall wrote:
> On (10:09 22/08/10), emmel put forth the proposition:
> >What are the opinions on including the DIB engine patch in the build? It
> >has to be enabled manually anyway (environment variable WINEDIB=on), so
> >there shouldn't be any trouble
On (10:09 22/08/10), emmel put forth the proposition:
What are the opinions on including the DIB engine patch in the build? It
has to be enabled manually anyway (environment variable WINEDIB=on), so
there shouldn't be any trouble, but it does fix some pointer issues with
a couple of programs.
I
On (20:41 26/08/10), emmel put forth the proposition:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 01:59:51AM -0500, Erik Hanson wrote:
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:09:34 +0200
emmel wrote:
> What are the opinions on including the DIB engine patch in the build?
> It has to be enabled manually anyway (environment variab
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 01:59:51AM -0500, Erik Hanson wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:09:34 +0200
> emmel wrote:
>
> > What are the opinions on including the DIB engine patch in the build?
> > It has to be enabled manually anyway (environment variable
> > WINEDIB=on), so there shouldn't be any tr
11 matches
Mail list logo
