Excellent! :)
Regards
Teravus
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Philippe (Merov) Bossut
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I spent some time Friday and today testing that OGP enabling patch from
> Pixel Gausman. Pixel moved the Interop sub-menu from World to Advanced so
> not to add this still experimental featu
Hi,
I spent some time Friday and today testing that OGP enabling patch from
Pixel Gausman. Pixel moved the Interop sub-menu from World to Advanced so
not to add this still experimental feature to the main UI. Vaak was
cantankerous as usual but we eventually went through the whole test plan.
Summar
!forward_to_soft
!forward_to_soft
probably works
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Lynne Wu wrote:
> !quit
> !quit
> !quit
>
> Does that work for off-topic discussions anymore?
>
> -CAD
> ___
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> h
!quit
!quit
!quit
Does that work for off-topic discussions anymore?
-CAD
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Can't we all just agree that somebody somewhere involved with DRM is a
Nazi and be done with it?
-Brad
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmode
While locking and security MAY be futile, that sure hasn't stopped people
with extremely deep pockets from trying everything in the book to prevent
you from stealing a pristine original digitally-exact duplicate of their
content. Case in point: Blu-Ray and HDCP
Yes, all the protection fails when i
Hello, guys, I have sucked by a strange question when I try
to compile the sub-part of the snowglobe. Actually, the llcommon project. I
use VS 2008 as the compiler and linker. My problem is as following:
1>-- Build started: Project: llcommon, Configuration: Release Win32
--
1>Linking.
In summary (and I think this topic is beyond the scope of the list) the
following things are true:
* At some point, unlocked content must become available. It doesn't
matter what method you use to lock it, where that locking takes place,
or where it is unlocked. For the viewer to actually use any o
Simple answer is YES. Where there is a will there is a way. If a hacker
wants in, he'll get in. Its simply a matter of time and effort. Security has
always been an oxymoron for that reason. The only thing you can do is
attempt to make it annoying to bypass said security, but those dedicated to
gett
Then what you are saying is that they will get past any lock.
Such as account infomation with the account UUID.
After all that is just a lock and getting the key will be no problem for some
one to do using the same path of thinking.
It is just a matter of time befor some one finds the key for that
Excuse me? For the content to be displayed on the client computer, it
has to be downloaded and decoded. Any obscfucation can only delay itself
from being bypassed and cannot stand forever. DRM is defective by design
- you can't have the consumer to hold the lock and the key and trust
(some of)
11 matches
Mail list logo
