Daniel Florey wrote:
Finally I think that there are many different preferences regarding templating.
It depends on what people are used to use and what they personally like.
The primary goal of projector was not to introduce new templating mechanisms,
but mainly focusses on the event driven
Daniel Florey wrote:
What I had in mind is the following:
If a have jsp/servlets that for example have to provide a news summary page,
this task may take very long. So it is more clever to cache the generated
output until some new news are added. This is what projector can do for you,
but I
Daniel Florey wrote:
OK, the example you've picked out seems to be complicated (as I've state in
the documentation). My intention for this templating was:
1. To make it very simple. You just mark the dynamic parts in html pages and
you optionally specify the matching content type.
2. It is not
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
StringTemplate is a general template engine not geared towards HTML as
well. I like Daniel's approach as it is cleaner and stricter in design
than StringTemplate and both enforce MV separation. Some constructions
in StringTemplate seem to be pretty random to me...
Well,
Tim Frank wrote:
Daniel,
Sorry to jump in the middle of this one, but I find it somewhat amusing
that you are having a huge discussion about separation of logic/layout
and then throw in an example from the HTML side of things that basically
goes back to mixing logic/layout.
How do you handle
Daniel Florey wrote:
Hi folks,
I've added a link to the Slide website that points to my (work in progress)
documentation of Projector.
Congratulation Daniel, that's a cool documentation as an introduction to
the projector.
I have yet to digest everything and think more about it, but I have one
Hello,
Can someone shed some light about what is the goal (features) of the
projector framework exactly ?
I'm trying to find out (like others) if it could be a foundation for
developping additional services regarding document management and
hopefully contribute.
What I have in mind at the moment
Tim Frank wrote:
I was wondering about how to implement workflow on top of WebDAV as
well... at a purely theoretical level. I had thought about using
extended elements/attributes in the file information, as it seems you
can arbitrarily add them. I do not know if a workflow standard RFC
exists
Daniel Florey wrote:
I'll add some projector docs to the website soon (Hopefully this or next
weekend).
Cheers,
Daniel
Great. Thanks a lot Daniel.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Julian wrote:
Has any consideration been put into coordinating with
the Apache Agila project? They are building a
standards based workflow system, and code exists
already since it was donated from Gluecode software.
On a side note (not related to workflow, but project cross-pollination),
if you
10 matches
Mail list logo
