Re: [RT] Cleaning up our modules (Part V)

2008-05-13 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...So, let's move core to top level as "engine", move the extensions from the > current "sling" dir to "extensions" and rename "sling" to "servlets" +1 -Bertrand

Re: [RT] Cleaning up our modules (Part V)

2008-05-13 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Felix Meschberger wrote: Agreed. In fact, bundleresource is probably also an extension... Maybe :) We might want to start thinking of required and optional extensions ;-) Because some extensions are required and used by the launchpad and some extensions are just there for demo and other purp

Re: [RT] Cleaning up our modules (Part V)

2008-05-13 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Felix Meschberger wrote: Yes, because providing a JCR repository instance is just part of the module. It also contains mocks for OSGi and Sling API interfaces, both of which have nothing to do with JCR. We could of course split into three: OSGi mocks, Sling API mocks and the JCR stuff and distr

Re: [RT] Cleaning up our modules (Part V)

2008-05-13 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 13:04 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > looking at the contents we have there core, > i18n, httpauth, bundleresource, servlet-resolver,servlets-get, > servlets-post. > > Most of them are central and it wouldn't make much sense to start Sling > without them (exc

Re: [RT] Cleaning up our modules (Part V)

2008-05-13 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 13:04 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > Felix Meschberger wrote: > >> And the last thing I noticed is that commons testing now contains > >> references to other sling modules which is a little bit against the idea > >> of commons being independent from Sling. As

Re: [RT] Cleaning up our modules (Part V)

2008-05-13 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Felix Meschberger wrote: I think the remaining part is the "sling" directory. I'm not sure if this contains some extensions we could move to the extensions dir? Wasn't that part of an earlier "Cleaning up our modules" approach ? No, we only moved eventing and scheduling to extensions but didn'

Re: [RT] Cleaning up our modules (Part V)

2008-05-13 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... it seems that we are nearly through - so this could be the last part of the series for now :)... Wait wait wait - that Hollywood contract for season II is on my desk, ready to sign

Re: [RT] Cleaning up our modules (Part V)

2008-05-13 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 08:30 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > Hi, > > it seems that we are nearly through - so this could be the last part of > the series for now :) Great !! > I think the remaining part is the "sling" directory. I'm not sure if > this contains some extensions we c

Re: [RT] Cleaning up our modules (Part V)

2008-05-13 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... it seems that we are nearly through - so this could be the last part of > the > series for now :)... Wait wait wait - that Hollywood contract for season II is on my desk, ready to sign ;-) > ... I think the r

[RT] Cleaning up our modules (Part V)

2008-05-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Hi, it seems that we are nearly through - so this could be the last part of the series for now :) I think the remaining part is the "sling" directory. I'm not sure if this contains some extensions we could move to the extensions dir? And I think we should find a better name than "sling" for