Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5 - webconsole config is broken

2009-05-11 Thread Ian Boston
+1 (non binding), a perfect release gets in the way of progress. Ian On 11 May 2009, at 10:40, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: For now I have created SLING-959 - what do people think of releasing with that ugly bug? I know recutting and r

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5 - webconsole config is broken

2009-05-11 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> For now I have created SLING-959 - what do people think of releasing >> with that ugly bug? I know recutting and revoting on the release is a >> pain, so we might want to go ahead, as long as we docum

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5 - webconsole config is broken

2009-05-11 Thread Juan José Vázquez Delgado
+1 On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> For now I have created SLING-959 - what do people think of releasing >> with that ugly bug? I know recutting and revoting on the release is a >> pain, so we might

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5 - webconsole config is broken

2009-05-11 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Jukka Zitting schrieb: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> For now I have created SLING-959 - what do people think of releasing >> with that ugly bug? I know recutting and revoting on the release is a >> pain, so we might want to go ahead, as long as w

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5 - webconsole config is broken

2009-05-11 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > For now I have created SLING-959 - what do people think of releasing > with that ugly bug? I know recutting and revoting on the release is a > pain, so we might want to go ahead, as long as we document known > issues with this rel

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5 - webconsole config is broken

2009-05-11 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Ian Boston wrote: > > I am seeing the following running the standalone launchpad with a clean > build of the sling-5-incubator-source-release tag, (and a clear local repo > for both o.a.sling and o.a.felix) should it be happening ? > > HTTP ERROR 500 >... > jav

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5

2009-05-08 Thread Ian Boston
I am seeing the following running the standalone launchpad with a clean build of the sling-5-incubator-source-release tag, (and a clear local repo for both o.a.sling and o.a.felix) should it be happening ? HTTP ERROR 500 Problem accessing /system/console/configMgr. Reason: Filter cann

JspForwardTest Failure (was: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5)

2009-05-08 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Bertrand Delacretaz schrieb: > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Ian Boston schrieb: >>> We (other people in the Sakai community) have seen the same failures >>> locally on one or two machines. >>> It was thought to be down to other sling servers sitting on

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5

2009-05-08 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi, > > Ian Boston schrieb: >> We (other people in the Sakai community) have seen the same failures >> locally on one or two machines. >> It was thought to be down to other sling servers sitting on either port >> 8080, or but after st

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5

2009-05-08 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Ian Boston schrieb: > We (other people in the Sakai community) have seen the same failures > locally on one or two machines. > It was thought to be down to other sling servers sitting on either port > 8080, or but after stopping those instances and re-running the > tests the passed and we

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5

2009-05-08 Thread Ian Boston
We (other people in the Sakai community) have seen the same failures locally on one or two machines. It was thought to be down to other sling servers sitting on either port 8080, or but after stopping those instances and re-running the tests the passed and we didn't investigate further.

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5

2009-05-08 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > ...I redid the release, which is not version 5 and we can vote again :)... I guess you mean *now* version 5 ;-) +1 on the release, details below. Signatures and digests verified. Tests with Maven version: 2.0.9, Java version: 1.5.0_16 o

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5

2009-05-07 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
+1 Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5

2009-05-07 Thread Vidar Ramdal
> You'll find the releases at: > http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/sling +1 Good work! -- Vidar S. Ramdal - http://www.idium.no Akersgata 16, N-0158 Oslo, Norway +47 21 531941, ext 2070

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5

2009-05-06 Thread Juan José Vázquez Delgado
+1 Thank you Carsten! BR, Juanjo.

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5

2009-05-06 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > This is basically just one big release, so please cast your votes, the > vote will be open for 72 hours. +1 Looks good. One comment going forward: The top level LICENSE and NOTICE files in the launchpad binaries do not cover the lice

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Sling 5

2009-05-06 Thread Felix Meschberger
+1 Checked with rat (full and filtered reports at [1]), built successfully from source and checked signatures. Thanks alot for preparing this release again, Carsten ! Regards Felix [1] http://people.apache.org/~fmeschbe/sling5/ Carsten Ziegeler schrieb: > Hello everyone, > > I redid the relea

[Vote] Release Apache Sling 5

2009-05-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Hello everyone, I redid the release, which is not version 5 and we can vote again :) You'll find the releases at: http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/sling I've created the same type of artifacts as for the last release. The main release is a release of the source tree with the version