Continuum or Hudson?

2009-06-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, We currently have two continuous integration setups for Sling: Continuum: http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=53 Hudson: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Sling/ I don't have much experience with Continuum, but every time I try to do

Re: Continuum or Hudson?

2009-06-09 Thread Ian Boston
+1, Having run both outside Apache, I found Hudson maven support better. (IMVHO) Ian On 9 Jun 2009, at 09:54, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, We currently have two continuous integration setups for Sling: Continuum:

Re: Continuum or Hudson?

2009-06-09 Thread Juan José Vázquez Delgado
I don't have much experience with Continuum, but every time I try to do something on vmbuild it's very slow and painful. Seems like that box is overburdened, and the UI is not very easy to use, IMHO. My experience with Continuum is not good either. I don't think we need two CI servers - what

Re: Continuum or Hudson?

2009-06-09 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
I don't care which one we use - as long as it is working and not spamming the mailing list :) (like the Felix Bamboo does as it sends a mail with each build which is triggered by each commit). And I agree to just use one server :) As people here seem to prefer Hudson, lets use that one. Carsten

Re: Continuum or Hudson?

2009-06-09 Thread Juan José Vázquez Delgado
As people here seem to prefer Hudson, lets use that one. I have no experience with TeamCity [1] but I feel this could be another option. Any feedback with this tool? [1] http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/ Juanjo.

Re: Continuum or Hudson?

2009-06-09 Thread Vidar Ramdal
2009/6/9 Juan José Vázquez Delgado juanjo.vazq...@gmail.com: As people here seem to prefer Hudson, lets use that one. I have no experience with TeamCity [1] but I feel this could be another option. Any feedback with this tool? Yes, we're using it in our shop. It was a breeze to set up, and