Hi,
We currently have two continuous integration setups for Sling:
Continuum:
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=53
Hudson:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Sling/
I don't have much experience with Continuum, but every time I try to
do
+1,
Having run both outside Apache, I found Hudson maven support better.
(IMVHO)
Ian
On 9 Jun 2009, at 09:54, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
We currently have two continuous integration setups for Sling:
Continuum:
I don't have much experience with Continuum, but every time I try to
do something on vmbuild it's very slow and painful. Seems like that
box is overburdened, and the UI is not very easy to use, IMHO.
My experience with Continuum is not good either.
I don't think we need two CI servers - what
I don't care which one we use - as long as it is working and not
spamming the mailing list :) (like the Felix Bamboo does as it sends a
mail with each build which is triggered by each commit).
And I agree to just use one server :)
As people here seem to prefer Hudson, lets use that one.
Carsten
As people here seem to prefer Hudson, lets use that one.
I have no experience with TeamCity [1] but I feel this could be
another option. Any feedback with this tool?
[1] http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/
Juanjo.
2009/6/9 Juan José Vázquez Delgado juanjo.vazq...@gmail.com:
As people here seem to prefer Hudson, lets use that one.
I have no experience with TeamCity [1] but I feel this could be
another option. Any feedback with this tool?
Yes, we're using it in our shop. It was a breeze to set up, and