Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

I've created SLING-347 and SLING-348 for removing the obsolete standard servlets and renaming the servlets default to servlets get. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Hi Am Dienstag, den 01.04.2008, 08:55 +0100 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz: > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ... Regarding the SlingInfoServlt: Shouldn't we move this away from the > > servlets-post ? It is not really a POST handler but rather a G

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... Regarding the SlingInfoServlt: Shouldn't we move this away from the > servlets-post ? It is not really a POST handler but rather a GET > handler right, good catch. > ... I suggest we move it to a new sling/i

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi, Regarding the SlingInfoServlt: Shouldn't we move this away from the servlets-post ? It is not really a POST handler but rather a GET handler. I suggest we move it to a new sling/info bundle ?? Or even a sling/mgt (management) bundle which could also be the basis for

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Good suggestions. I finished the renaming; hopefully everything is still working... Carsten Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi, Am Montag, den 31.03.2008, 19:43 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: Ok, I renamed the ujax stuff to servlets post and renamed all references to sling as well. The integration

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Hi, Regarding the SlingInfoServlt: Shouldn't we move this away from the servlets-post ? It is not really a POST handler but rather a GET handler. I suggest we move it to a new sling/info bundle ?? Or even a sling/mgt (management) bundle which could also be the basis for more management support st

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >... b) the SlingInfoServlet is currently mounted at /ujax. I didn't want to > > change this to /sling as at this path the console is mounted. What do we > > want to do here? > > How about /system/sling/info ?... +

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Hi, Am Montag, den 31.03.2008, 19:43 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > Ok, I renamed the ujax stuff to servlets post and renamed all references > to sling as well. The integration tests pass. > > There are at least two remaining issues: > a) what about the dojo-ujax module? rename it to dojo-sl

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... b) the SlingInfoServlet is currently mounted at /ujax. I didn't want to > change this to /sling as at this path the console is mounted. What do we > want to do here?... /slinginfo maybe? -Bertrand

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Ok, I renamed the ujax stuff to servlets post and renamed all references to sling as well. The integration tests pass. There are at least two remaining issues: a) what about the dojo-ujax module? b) the SlingInfoServlet is currently mounted at /ujax. I didn't want to change this to /sling as a

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi, Am Montag, den 31.03.2008, 12:07 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: Bertrand Delacretaz schrieb: On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think we should do this renaming asap. Do we already have a jira issue for this? Yes, ht

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Hi, Am Montag, den 31.03.2008, 12:07 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > Bertrand Delacretaz schrieb: > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> I think we should do this renaming asap. Do we already have a jira issue > >> for this? > > > > Yes, htt

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Hi, Am Montag, den 31.03.2008, 12:22 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > Felix Meschberger schrieb: > > I agree 100%. Are you going to do this ? Otherwise, I could start doing > > this this afternoon. > > > I would to it tomorrow :) So if you want to do it today... :) Alright, I will let you do it

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... So, we go for sling/servlets-post for the current ujax stuff and have > sling/servlets-default for the get stuff?... +1 -Bertrand

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Felix Meschberger schrieb: I agree 100%. Are you going to do this ? Otherwise, I could start doing this this afternoon. I would to it tomorrow :) So if you want to do it today... :) Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Bertrand Delacretaz schrieb: On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think we should do this renaming asap. Do we already have a jira issue for this? Yes, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-326, but it needs to be updated according to this thre

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

I agree 100%. Are you going to do this ? Otherwise, I could start doing this this afternoon. Regards Felix Am Montag, den 31.03.2008, 11:32 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > I think we should do this renaming asap. Do we already have a jira issue > for this? > > Carsten > > Bertrand Delacretaz

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we should do this renaming asap. Do we already have a jira issue > for this? Yes, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-326, but it needs to be updated according to this thread. -Bertrand

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

I think we should do this renaming asap. Do we already have a jira issue for this? Carsten Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... OTOH by differentiating between read-access in the servlets.default and write-access in the

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... OTOH by differentiating between read-access in the servlets.default and > write-access in the (current) ujax module we also simplify updates or > replacement of functionality. Not sure, whether this is enough to

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Hi all, Am Donnerstag, den 27.03.2008, 10:02 -0700 schrieb Tobias Bocanegra: > > * The Ujax* classes in the sling/ujax module are renamed to Sling* > so your saying: > > o.a.s.ujax.impl.UjaxPostServlet -> o.a.s.servlets.post.SlingPostServlet > o.a.s.ujax.impl.UjaxPostProcesser -> o.a.s.servlets

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Tobias Bocanegra wrote: so a 'special' parameter would for example be: sling:postMoveSrc ? or sling:post:MoveSrc ? sling:post:MoveSrc this sounds weird, but ok for me :-) Yepp, but it helps to avoid name clashes :) Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

> * The Ujax* classes in the sling/ujax module are renamed to Sling* so your saying: o.a.s.ujax.impl.UjaxPostServlet -> o.a.s.servlets.post.SlingPostServlet o.a.s.ujax.impl.UjaxPostProcesser -> o.a.s.servlets.post.SlingPostProcessor ... could this not be moved to the org.apache.sling.servlets.d

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... The Sling Client Library is just a single file - ujax.js (or now > sling.js). Of course we may create single module for that, but I am not > sure, whether this is worth it I agree that this doesn't require a

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 27.03.2008, 15:35 +0100 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 +1 to the proposed changes as well, and I'd suggest using "sling client library" as the

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 27.03.2008, 15:35 +0100 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> +1 > > > > +1 to the proposed changes as well, and I'd suggest using "sling > > client library" as the name f

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 +1 to the proposed changes as well, and I'd suggest using "sling client library" as the name for what was ujax, for use in docs, etc. Hmm, I think if we use this in the docs, the module n

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 +1 to the proposed changes as well, and I'd suggest using "sling client library" as the name for what was ujax, for use in docs, etc. > ... And also I really would like to see the name "Catapult" being used > somew

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

+1 And also I really would like to see the name "Catapult" being used somewhere in Sling, I don't think it makes sense to use it here. So lets keep it for something better... Carsten Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi all, Am Montag, den 10.03.2008, 15:51 +0100 schrieb Felix Meschberger: Current

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Hi all, Am Montag, den 10.03.2008, 15:51 +0100 schrieb Felix Meschberger: > Currently names used by Sling are prefixed with sling: with the > exception of well known parameters of the ujax servlets. To get all > these prefixes in line I suggest we change the prefix used by ujax > parameters to sli

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

> i think it is confusing to deal with all those technologies for a newbie. > everything from jackrabbit to sling to jcr to osgi to launchpad to ujax. > some of this complexity is not necessary and can be removed easily. > i think the ujax / sling distinction can definitely go. i would basicall

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... Ah, this is the right time to throw in my "catapult" naming idea :) > (Some day someone will pick it up, I'm 100% sure...)... Sure. some day ;-) -Bertrand

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:28 AM, David Nuescheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...i would basically > recommend to replace ujax with sling throughout the code, this > particularly includes the js side, and would graduate ujax into the > sling js library, which makes perfect sense to me Agr

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

David Nuescheler wrote: hi guys, i think it is confusing to deal with all those technologies for a newbie. everything from jackrabbit to sling to jcr to osgi to launchpad to ujax. some of this complexity is not necessary and can be removed easily. i think the ujax / sling distinction can definit

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

hi guys, i think it is confusing to deal with all those technologies for a newbie. everything from jackrabbit to sling to jcr to osgi to launchpad to ujax. some of this complexity is not necessary and can be removed easily. i think the ujax / sling distinction can definitely go. i would basically

Re: Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

doesn't the "Jax" refer to the mechanism how the form post is handled? it would at least call it 'sjax' regards, toby On 3/10/08, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently names used by Sling are prefixed with sling: with the > exception of well known parameters of th

Replace ujax: prefix to sling:

Hi all, Currently names used by Sling are prefixed with sling: with the exception of well known parameters of the ujax servlets. To get all these prefixes in line I suggest we change the prefix used by ujax parameters to sling: WDYT ? Regards Felix