On Thu, May 20, 2004 3:52 pm, Simon Bryan said:
Hi all,
I wnat to start sharing the load of my thin clients between two servers.
We currently bhave one running RH7.2 and LTSP2. I have setup a second
server running FC1 and LTSP4 (and installed the kernel from LTSP3 as
suggested)
The first
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 15:43 +1000, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 03:10:21PM +0930, Luke (Terry) Vanderfluit wrote:
Hi,
Sheesh,
I was planning to start using fedora as soon as core 2 came out
(currently I'm running Redhat 9) but I have a video card with an nvidia
On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 08:43, David Kempe wrote:
Hey anyone have a simple explanation for this phenomenom?
Yep. RAID re-sync is deliberately limited. The idea being that disk
performance isn't affected too greatly whilst re-syncing the drive (so
your application stays running, the reason you
I just installed Fedora Core 2 this AM and I have no trouble with the
NVidia video card - admittedly I haven't ever bothered with NVidia drivers
unless they are included in the distro, such as Xandros 2 (also installed -
different PC - different Nvidea card).
Knoppix 3.4 with Kernel 2.6.x also
On Mon, 24 May 2004, bill wrote:
I just installed Fedora Core 2 this AM and I have no trouble with the
NVidia video card - admittedly I haven't ever bothered with NVidia drivers
unless they are included in the distro, such as Xandros 2 (also installed -
different PC - different Nvidea card).
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 13:58, Matthew Davidson wrote:
Are these things to avoid, or can anybody recommend a model that actually
works with CUPS/SANE?
One thing to consider is that CPU processing. A lot of the
non-supported MF systems are not supported because a lot of the
functionality of the
On Sun, 2004-05-23 at 18:31, Gary Bennett wrote:
Hello,
I subbed to SLUG last weekend, have read along for the week and thought it
about time to introduce myself.
snip
In the next month or so I'm planning to buy a new machine. My current
thinking is for a P4 2.8GHz processor with 512MB
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 20:48, Adam Felix Bogacki wrote:
Thanks Mary,
I tried typing Linux init=/bin/sh at the LILO prompt and it booted
without all the bells whistles, but when I tried 'vi' or 'apt-get' I
was told they were
unknown commands. I had thought I might try changing
Lyle Chapman wrote:
Has anybody got the same problem?
I have just upgraded to Fedora Core 2 and have installed the nvidia
drivers. I cannot find the file XF86Config the closest file is
xorg.conf which has the same information. I have tried adding the
driver line for nvidia but it hangs the
On Mon, May 24, 2004, Adam Felix Bogacki wrote:
I tried typing Linux init=/bin/sh at the LILO prompt and it booted
without all the bells whistles, but when I tried 'vi' or 'apt-get' I
was told they were unknown commands. I had thought I might try
changing '/etc/apt/sources.list' to testing
Glen Turner wrote:
Yep. RAID re-sync is deliberately limited. The idea being that disk
performance isn't affected too greatly whilst re-syncing the drive (so
your application stays running, the reason you RAIDed in the first
place).
Under Linux 2.4 see proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
makes sense
From Montreal Canada, hello to Sydney LUG!
Having seen many Mac stickers on car's bumber, I thought that I could, me
too, show what my colors are on my car.
I searched on the internet to find a Tux sticker, this sympathetic
antarctic animal. I was amazed and a bit sad when I discovered that
Lyle, not answering your question, (ati radeon user).
But I'd just like to say how pathetically grateful I
am that we finally have a config file that is not mixed case.
vi /etc/X11/Xtab
vi /etc/X11/Xftab
[EMAIL PROTECTED]%!@#
vi /etc/X11/XFtab
yes!!
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Assassin wrote:
Lyle, not answering your question, (ati radeon user).
But I'd just like to say how pathetically grateful I
am that we finally have a config file that is not mixed case.
vi /etc/X11/Xtab
vi /etc/X11/Xftab
[EMAIL PROTECTED]%!@#
vi /etc/X11/XFtab
Hi,
I've just moved out of Sydney to a regional area (Coffs Harbour), where
there is no even remotely local (ooh, what a fab oxymoron) LUG that I can
find. There seems to have been one some years ago which has presumably
withered and died, leaving no trace beyond 404 errors and bouncing
On Mon, May 24, 2004, Matthew Davidson wrote:
So I have no alternative but to start one myself. Perhaps this
discussion belongs on slug-chat (to which I am not subscribed), but
I'd welcome any suggestions about how to go about this, or offers of
assistance. I've read the LUG HOWTO, and
Matthew Davidson wrote:
...snip.
So I have no alternative but to start one myself.
Biggest problem is venue. so unless you have the facilities where you
live and are happy to have people there (and do not mind the security
risk), then I would go whereever you can get free venue. Anything
One thing that occurred to me is that it might be better to
set up a free software users' group, rather than a Linux
one
Probably a good idea given the smaller population base. I'd suggest that you be wary
of what you call and how you promote such a group, since the term free software is
Yee Haa !
it worked like a charm.
I mounted /usr and /var and deleted samba although I have not been
able to reinstall it
under either testing or unstable due to dependency problems. According
to error
messages, it depends on samba-common 2.* but 3.* is installed.
Nevertheless, I
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 12:05:14PM +1000, Terry Collins wrote:
Biggest problem is venue. so unless you have the facilities where you
My suggestion is to find a bowlo club or similar. They're
often grateful to get even a small amount of extra business,
and they have food/drink and function
On Tue, May 25, 2004, Adam Bogacki wrote:
Yee Haa !
it worked like a charm.
Great!
You will probably want to keep an eye on http://bugs.debian.org/samba
for an update to your particular bug (although there's a bunch of
Grave bugs there, and I didn't look long enough to work out which
SLUG and SLUG's Debian Special Interest Group are having a codefest this
Saturday 29th May:
-- What --
SLUG Codefests are informal hacking days. Bring yourself, a computer and
some ideas for things to hack on.
The day will feature:
- Hacking talks (Ben Leslie, Jamie Wilkinson, Del...)
-
Hi all
I have been using screen to get multiple screens but I read that it can
be used to get a text dump of a session. But I havent found detailed
instructions for that or a tutorial. Reading the man pages sugggests
that somehow I attach to an other process that would dump the output but
its
quote who=Michael Lake
I have been using screen to get multiple screens but I read that it can be
used to get a text dump of a session.
Sounds like script, not screen.
Reading the man pages sugggests that somehow I attach to an other process
that would dump the output but its not clear.
24 matches
Mail list logo
