On 4/23/06, Benno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't understand what you are trying to say here. I am aware of the
> acroynm expansions and the meaning of the terms and my previous
> statement stands as is.
>
> Specifically the base DN, that is the root of an information heirarchy
> could be re
> There's not a lot of in depth documentation about preseeding that I could
> find.
You can use kickstart with Ubuntu - quite a bit easier to understand than
pre-seed configuration. :-)
- Jeff
--
linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/
"For a list
> OP was using dc=example,dc=com and RFC 3663 says in this case the domain
> is example.com.
Dude, you can use gobbledegook in a DN. It doesn't have to have anything to
do with a DNS name. They're unrelated until the point that you decide to
relate them by inference. There is nothing special abo
On Sun Apr 23, 2006 at 17:54:40 +1000, Philip Greggs wrote:
>On 4/23/06, Benno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>Now as it turned out 'example.com' is active domain and belongs to
>someone else (#wohois example.com). So with 'HOST ldap.example.com'
>in ldap.conf of the client, which is #lapdadd -x -D
I'm writing a program to calculate space lost to the difference between block
size and filesize (Surely this has been done before, but I couldn't find it
from a quick few googles).
Whilst doing this, I've encountered the below and I'm unsure why it is
happening to some files only.
On an ext3
I'm considering updating my fc4 box to fc5
Has anyone found any problems
in directly upgrading.
Ie has fedora changed the any file locations
(again!!)
Phill
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglis
Hi, I'm a Linux user from perth, WA, and I am
travelling to Sydney next week. I was wondering if you know of any
Linux-friendly computer stores in Sydney. I looked up everythinglinux, and they
no longer have a retail store-it is a wharehouse with no personal browsing
allowed!
So I am looki
Thanks for the replies.
I'll just eventually re-format the drive.
I'm moving all data from my NTFS formatted drives to ext3 as I'm setting
up my home LAN to run linux on all PC's (one as a NAS unit), though I'll
keep an XP install (dual-boot linux) on my laptop and use a thumb-drive
if I need
Phill O'Flynn wrote:
I'm considering updating my fc4 box to fc5
I've upgraded several FC4 to FC5 both by CDROM
and by YUM.
By CDROM it's straightforward; by YUM it's somewhat
painful.
If you do, use CDROM. Once done reboot and check your
/etc/yum.repos.d to ensure only 'fedora' core and u
Jeff Waugh wrote:
OP was using dc=example,dc=com and RFC 3663 says in this case the domain
is example.com.
Dude, you can use gobbledegook in a DN.
This is not true that you can use gobbledegook in a DN. That's the
reason for the SCHEMAS and RFCs, to keep DN etc in line with standa
Benno wrote:
On Sun Apr 23, 2006 at 17:54:40 +1000, Philip Greggs wrote:
On 4/23/06, Benno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now as it turned out 'example.com' is active domain and belongs to
someone else (#wohois example.com). So with 'HOST ldap.example.com'
in ldap.conf of the client, which
On 24/04/2006, at 7:53 AM, O Plameras wrote:
Jeff Waugh wrote:
Dude, you can use gobbledegook in a DN.
This is not true that you can use gobbledegook in a DN. That's the
reason for the SCHEMAS and RFCs, to keep DN etc in line with
standards. There
are two standards X.500 and IETF. You use
Sorry - suffering from premature posting - I'm seeing a therapist
about it..
On 24/04/2006, at 7:53 AM, O Plameras wrote:
Jeff Waugh wrote:
Dude, you can use gobbledegook in a DN.
This is not true that you can use gobbledegook in a DN. That's the
reason for the SCHEMAS and RFCs, to keep
Tony Green wrote:
Sorry - suffering from premature posting - I'm seeing a therapist
about it..
On 24/04/2006, at 7:53 AM, O Plameras wrote:
Jeff Waugh wrote:
Dude, you can use gobbledegook in a DN.
This is not true that you can use gobbledegook in a DN. That's the
reason for the SCHEMAS
On 24/04/2006, at 8:28 AM, O Plameras wrote:
Tony Green wrote:
On 24/04/2006, at 7:53 AM, O Plameras wrote:
This is not true that you can use gobbledegook in a DN. That's the
reason for the SCHEMAS and RFCs, to keep DN etc in line with
standards. There
are two standards X.500 and IETF. You us
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 08:33 +1000, Tony Green wrote:
> On 24/04/2006, at 8:28 AM, O Plameras wrote:
> > Tony Green wrote:
> >> On 24/04/2006, at 7:53 AM, O Plameras wrote:
> >>> This is not true that you can use gobbledegook in a DN. That's the
> >>> reason for the SCHEMAS and RFCs, to keep DN etc
Tony Green wrote:
On 24/04/2006, at 8:28 AM, O Plameras wrote:
Tony Green wrote:
On 24/04/2006, at 7:53 AM, O Plameras wrote:
This is not true that you can use gobbledegook in a DN. That's the
reason for the SCHEMAS and RFCs, to keep DN etc in line with
standards. There
are two standards X.5
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:31:07AM +1000, O Plameras wrote:
> Tony Green wrote:
> > [ .. ]
> >You didn't say "you can't" you said "This is not true that you can".
>
> Right that's what I said. "This is not true that you can" does not
> [ .. ]
'can' and 'cannot' and 'may' and 'may not' are
probl
Benno wrote:
On Sun Apr 23, 2006 at 17:54:40 +1000, Philip Greggs wrote:
On 4/23/06, Benno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now as it turned out 'example.com' is active domain and belongs to
someone else (#wohois example.com). So with 'HOST ldap.example.com'
in ldap.conf of the client, which
Hi Guys
May I ask you about fc2? Is it equivalent to REL2?
Cheers
selim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matthew Hannigan
Sent: Monday, 24 April 2006 9:51 AM
To: slug@slug.org.au
Subject: Re: WAS: RE: [SLUG] Invalid credentials error code
Hi All,
I helped a friend install Ubuntu (5.10) on her laptop this weekend,
but couldn't get X to display in the native resolution (1280x800).
It's using the i810 driver, and defaults back to 1024x768.
The X output shows that it detects the panel and the correct
resolution of it, but for all my c
This one time, at band camp, Selim Jahangir wrote:
>Hi Guys
>May I ask you about fc2? Is it equivalent to REL2?
If I remember correctly, FC2 is closest to Red Hat EL 3; RHEL 2 is based on
RHL7.3 (well, 2.1AS at least).
"Hope this helps."
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http:/
I never knew linux stores existed :( Anyone help as I'm interested
also.. :/
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 00:53 +0800, robert hunter wrote:
> Hi, I'm a Linux user from perth, WA, and I am travelling to Sydney
> next week. I was wondering if you know of any Linux-friendly computer
> stores in Sydney.
O Plameras wrote:
Phill O'Flynn wrote:
I'm considering updating my fc4 box to fc5
I've upgraded several FC4 to FC5 both by CDROM
and by YUM.
By CDROM it's straightforward; by YUM it's somewhat
painful.
Thought about the procedure. It is good practice to run
the following and save output
On 4/24/06, Charles Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never knew linux stores existed :( Anyone help as I'm interested
> also.. :/
Yeah everythinglinux had store front in Fivedock, although these days
they dont. But atleast you can still do pickup from the warehouse in
Silverwater.
As to any
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 10:51 +1000, Menno Schaaf wrote:
> I helped a friend install Ubuntu (5.10) on her laptop this weekend,
> but couldn't get X to display in the native resolution (1280x800).
> It's using the i810 driver, and defaults back to 1024x768.
>
> The X output shows that it detects the
No, it doesn't have the virtual there... I'll give that a go and see
how we go, feedback on that by tonight hopefully.
On 4/24/06, Erle Pereira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 10:51 +1000, Menno Schaaf wrote:
> > I helped a friend install Ubuntu (5.10) on her laptop this weekend
Hey hey.
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 10:51 +1000, Menno Schaaf wrote:
> I helped a friend install Ubuntu (5.10) on her laptop this weekend,
> but couldn't get X to display in the native resolution (1280x800).
> It's using the i810 driver, and defaults back to 1024x768.
>
> The X output shows that it de
Michael Fox wrote:
>As to any other stores similar, can't say I know any. If you want
>hardware that's Linux compatible or know to work. The only solution is
>to RESEARCH based on what you want using google. And even ask people
>who might have used it or come across the item in question and can
>c
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 11:10 +0930, Ryan Verner wrote:
> Michael Fox wrote:
>
> >As to any other stores similar, can't say I know any. If you want
> >hardware that's Linux compatible or know to work. The only solution is
> >to RESEARCH based on what you want using google. And even ask people
> >who
If you visit DSE NZ they have a much larger range of cheapy DSE branded
products. DSE australia is more focused on branded products, and
occasionally they will be ordered in by dse au.
Essentially the two stores are related by name only, they have different
buying groups etc.
There is also a m
Thanks Pete, It's not there on tuxmobil, but once i get everything
working (i'm yet to look at sound, but i have gotten the wireless
working with WPA-PKS), I'll make sure to add it.
The blog entry on the 6400 may come in handy as well.
On 4/24/06, Peter Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey hey.
Mon Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:51:38AM +1000, Menno Schaaf wrote:
> I helped a friend install Ubuntu (5.10) on her laptop this weekend,
> but couldn't get X to display in the native resolution (1280x800).
> It's using the i810 driver, and defaults back to 1024x768.
If it's anything like my Dell X1, t
A p M y B o I p E v N u
V v I p A q G n R v A p
C a I p A j L d I c S b
X d A y N q A j X v
V n A v L d I c U e M q
S l O i M l A v
M j E w R q I m D y I u A i
http://www.diminobag.com
As if in answer to his fevered plea, a thunderous roar came from the
tu
34 matches
Mail list logo
